-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/11/13 15:52, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> Now, for some new quotes
Thanks Ben, I couldn't have asked for more :)
Don't worry about official endorsement from the Pirate Party AU - your quote
communicate GPG's importance sufficiently.
Best,
Sam.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/11/13 22:01, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I send five variants (but the best is all of them :) ):
Thanks Marko! Is it OK if I rephrase two of them like this?:
"I use GnuPG because I was taught it's a sin to open other people's letters"
"I use
>> "MFPA" == MFPA writes:
Hi
> Hi
> On Monday 4 November 2013 at 10:43:43 PM, in
> , Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> - from my own experience I am convinced that smime
>> is much easierthan gpg[2] for reasons I am not
>> going to repeat here. (I got 7out of 10 of my
>> fr
can BitMail.sf.net as a p2p email tool for encrypted Email (and
hybrid with IMAP-Email) be regarded as a reference model for
research to create a secure Email Client? as it uses both, gnupg and
openssl!
I would suggest figuring out very precisely what you intend by
"secure." Once you hav
(Sorry, failed again to reply to the list, so you probably have this message
twice again.)
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:32:38PM -0800, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> >On Tuesday 5 November 2013 at 11:03:19 PM, in
> >, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> >
> >> But if you sign it with an exportable
> >> signature, you ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 6 November 2013 at 11:42:49 AM, in
, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Well take for example iOs: using pgp is a sort of a
> nightmare.
So I have heard.
> The reasons why I think smime is easier to use for the
> average user are: smime is
