Hello mirimir !
mirimir wrote:
> I'm using Thunderbird with Enigmail. Enigmail is at 1.5.2
> (20130913-2148) and gpg is at 1.4.11. Is it best to wait for Enigmail to
> update, or to update gpg manually?
Enigmail has no cryptographic code itself, it only passes the commands to
GPG.
So
On 10/06/2013 02:21 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 10/05/2013 10:09 PM, mirimir wrote:
>> On 10/05/2013 08:56 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>>
>>> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1
>>> release: Version 1.4.15. This is a *security fix* release and all users
>>> are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi GnuPG users,
> I see at https://www.enigmail.net/documentation/quickstart-ch1.php that
> GnuPG 2.0 is apparently recommended (at least for Windows).
You may use Enigmail with either GnuPG 1.4 or 2.0.
The reasons for the recommendation are t
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:08 schrieb Werner Koch :
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 14:58, so...@dersonic.org said:
>
>> i just tried to compile the 2.0.22 version on Mac OS X 10.8.5 with XCode 5.0.
>
> This is known. See for example bug 1541. Sorry, I can't do anything
> about it until someone provides a tes
On 05-10-2013 10:56, Werner Koch wrote:
The README in the source bzip2 file still states 1.4.14.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnu
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 23:30, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
> The README in the source bzip2 file still states 1.4.14.
Ah well, I should have not mentioned the exact version number there.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
_
