On 1 April 2013 19:46, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 12:24 PM, adrelanos wrote:
>
> > gpg uses only(?) 40 chars for the fingerprint.
> > (I mean the output of: gpg --fingerprint --keyid-format long.)
>
> this is a 160-bit SHA-1 digest of the public key material and the
> creation dat
Hello all,
I'm looking into setting myself up with some OpenPGP cards, and I'm
looking into some opinions on using separate OpenPGP card for the
master key and sub-keys vs using a single OpenPGP card.
The idea behind this would be that my master OpenPGP card would be kept
in a safe area (hidden c
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Branko Majic wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm looking into setting myself up with some OpenPGP cards, and I'm
> looking into some opinions on using separate OpenPGP card for the
> master key and sub-keys vs using a single OpenPGP card.
>
> The idea behind this would be t
On 06/03/2013 08:04 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Bitcoin is essentially a ledger where you have an array of fingerprints
> (160 bit hashes of a public key) and a value (number of coins in wallet).
i thought that bitcoin didn't hash the public keys at all, but rather
used the full elliptic curve p
I already moved my subkeys to one cryptostick.
When i tried to move the primary key (4096 RSA) to another stick i got:
>gpg> keytocard
>Really move the primary key? (y/N) y
>Signature key : [none]
>Encryption key: [none]
>Authentication key: [none]
>Please select where to store the key:
>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Mustrum wrote:
> I already moved my subkeys to one cryptostick.
> When i tried to move the primary key (4096 RSA) to another stick i got:
>
>>gpg> keytocard
>>Really move the primary key? (y/N) y
>>Signature key : [none]
>>Encryption key: [none]
>>Authentic
