On 06/04/13 19:10, Ryan Sawhill wrote:
> (individual maintainers building packages? seriously?)
I think you misread a statement /I/ made. I said individual maintainers
in Debian sign packages. They do not sign built binaries, but rather the
source package. After that, an automated build system tak
At 1365102936 seconds of The Epoch, Werner Koch wrote:
> Specifying the Epoch will anyway stop working in 2038 on many systems,
> thus it is probably not good to allow its use. If a fixed data is
> required, one may always specify something like "20130404T153012" for
> both, the creation date and
At 1364755319 seconds of The Epoch, Ken Kundert wrote:
> I am currently using gpg-agent to hold both my gpg and ssh keys. I use two
> ssh
> keys, which means that when I log in I have to give up to four passphrases to
> unlock all of my keys. Given that gpg-agent is primarily a labor-saving
> d
On 04/08/2013 12:14 PM, Kevin wrote:
> Forgive me if this answer seems too simplistic--perhaps I am missing
> something--but would it be possible to make your SSH authentication keys
> subkeys of the same master/signing key? Then, when you unlock the
> master key, all the sub-keys should unlock w
At 1365125582 seconds of The Epoch, Don Saklad wrote:
> A PC user unfamiliar with any free software would like to send
> messages that only the two of us can read. Now what do I do? The numbers
> of steps for it appear to be insurmountable! And I've failed to
> understand GNUPG myself.
There isn't
Hi Ken,
Sorry for not replying sooner, I somehow lost track of this thread...
Rather than type it all out, I'll just point you to this blog post that
someone (Jeroen?) helpfully put together on the topic:
http://budts.be/weblog/2012/08/ssh-authentication-with-your-pgp-key
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 a
On 2 April 2013 18:45, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 05:40 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > In bitcoin you have the concept of a 'vanity key' much like vanity
> license
> > plates, see:
> >
> > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0
> >
> > I wonder if there is anything simila
On 3 April 2013 19:39, Andreas Mattheiss wrote:
> Well, uhm, if it's really important to you:
>
> The concept of hashes/fingerprints/etc. is that it is (next to) impossible
> to find an entity-to-be-hashed (here a key) if you specify the hash. In
> fact a hash function that allows you to do this w
