Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 11:39 AM, Stan Tobias wrote:
> > Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> >> For a pseudonymous author who wants to establish a credible claim to a
> >> given identity, one way would be to encourage the people who have been
> >> following the work of that author t
On 04/07/2013 04:06 AM, Stan Tobias wrote:
> I'd be willing, too, to sign the Enemy's key, as long as its UID says
> "Enemy" and not "Friend".
But in fact, no one identifies in either way; "Enemy" and "Friend" are
relational terms, and are not identities. Neither of them belong in the
UID.
If y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2013 02:19 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> But let's bring this discussion back out of the metaphysical
> territory of "what is the true nature of identity". In response
> to adrelanos' question, I tried to give an example of what sort