On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:43, quanngu...@mbm.vn said:
> (Maybe you forgot that I asked 2 questions in the first email
No.
>> p.s.
>> Maybe http://gnupg.org/service.html is of help to you.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On 18/06/12 20:39, Werner Koch wrote:
> FWIW, Libgcrypt uses this RNG directly in addition to other sources.
Actually... I just checked git.gnupg.org, and I see these lines in Libgcrypt,
file random/rndhw.c:
# if defined (__i386__) && SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG == 4 && defined (__GNUC__)
# define USE_P
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:55, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> I'm running x86_64: the VIA Nano is a 64-bits processor. So I think Libgcrypt
> doesn't recognise it can use the padlock from the VIA Nano.
I have a patch in the queue and even a woodware note at my monitor.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org wrote on 06/19/2012 01:50:04 AM:
> - Message from Sam Smith on Mon, 18 Jun
> 2012 19:30:44 -0400 -
>
> To:
>
> Gnupg
>
> Subject:
>
> RE: way to see what cipher/algo was used to create your key?
>
> Does anybody know a way to learn what cipher & hash wa
Am Di 19.06.2012, 09:05:41 schrieb michaelquig...@theway.org:
> The details file documents using the --list-keys command with the and
> specifying the --with-fingerprint option twice. This produces a list
> which shows the algorithm used for the key. This can also be used with
> the --list-secre
On Jun 19, 2012, at 1:50 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Di 19.06.2012, 01:03:26 schrieb Michael Hannemann:
>
>> pub:f:1024:17:xx--TpTpTpTp:1999-04-08:::-:[my collaborator]::scaESCA:
>> sub:f:2048:16:xx--TsTsTsTs:1999-04-08::e:
>
> This seems not to leave any room for ambiguity: One ke
Sam Smith smickson at hotmail.com wrote on:
Tue Jun 19 01:30:44 CEST 2012
>a way to learn what cipher & hash was used to create the secret
key?
export your secret key as seckey.asc
then do gpg --list-packets seckey.asc
here is an example of one of mine:
V:\z\>gpg --list-packets v:\seckey.a
On 06/19/2012 01:50 PM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> (btw, Should a listing explaining these things be in the FAQ ? )
I won't put it in there. Once you open the door to that, then you have
to answer questions about "so how do I change these settings?" and then
you're explaining half of the edit-k
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:50, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
> (all current gnupg keys are v4, older keys from pgp were v3, maybe
> when elliptic curve crypto gets done, there might be a v5 ;-) )
2.1beta has ECC support as described by RFC6637. Still using v4.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedan
Thanks for your help.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:43, quanngu...@mbm.vn said:
>
> > (Maybe you forgot that I asked 2 questions in the first email
>
> No.
>
> >> p.s.
> >> Maybe http://gnupg.org/service.html is of help to you.
>
>
> Salam-Shalom,
>
Hello. When I had a 32-bit version of Windows XP, I was able to utilize both
the newer version of Gpg 2.0.X and the older 1.4.X version of it at the same
time, and I would like to do the same thing now that I have a 64-bit version
of Win7. I have installed the newer version, as well as the GPA
11 matches
Mail list logo