Re: GnuPG 2.1 beta 3 released

2011-12-26 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:00, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said: > It would be very good if there were still a way to completely 'sandox' (for > want of a better term) an instance of gpg, so that it uses its own key > rings and trust databases. I certainly find that for testing purposes it > is very usef

Re: Encrypting using gpgsm and self-signed certificates

2011-12-26 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 01:23, drfar...@acm.org said: > self-signed x509 certs via gpgsm as a mechanism for encryption. > Unfortunately all I get back from gpgsm is "No Value". The output of That is a misleading error message. You should also enable gpg-agent logging in gpg-agent.conf to see the re

German Privacy Foundation Crypto-stick

2011-12-26 Thread mcmurphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i'm trying to work with the Crypto-stick of the German Privacy Foundation (https://www.privacyfoundation.de/crypto_stick/crypto_stick_english/) under ubuntu 11 64-bit. Unfortunately it works only for root or sudoers. An UNPRVILEGED user gets the f

Re: German Privacy Foundation Crypto-stick

2011-12-26 Thread Crypto Stick
Hi! Please install this package (UDEV rule) and it should work. https://www.assembla.com/spaces/cryptostick/documents/ds_EMCisGr4k7QeJe5cbCb/download/ds_EMCisGr4k7QeJe5cbCb Am 27.12.2011 00:46, schrieb mcmurphy: > Hi, > > i'm trying to work with the Crypto-stick of the German Privacy > Foundatio

Re: German Privacy Foundation Crypto-stick

2011-12-26 Thread mcmurphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, thank you for the answer. There is no difference. I'm not sure, whether the installation works. There is no new rule in /etc/udev/rules.d. Is it gnupg-ccid.rules in /etc/udev/? However: Nothing changed for not-sudoer-user. Maybe there is something