Thanx for your input.
Ok, so Im guessing the RSA-modulus (p and q) are stored on the card
along with the private exponents, or
perhaps the private key in its whole, already computed?
How much of the RSA-operations are made on the card, in terms of key
generation, signature making etc?
Does anyone
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:34:14 -0600
Aaron Toponce articulated:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:25:20PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:41:57 -0600
> > Aaron Toponce articulated:
> > > http://passwordcard.org will fix that. :)
> >
> > Dumping GShit would have been my first choice.
>
>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:15:44AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> I think you are misunderstanding what I am inferring. For starters,
> that is the 5th account that I have heard or known of that was hacked
> in March alone. I am sure that the total is far higher based on a simple
> statistical accounting of
> By the way Rob, and I mean nothing personal, my reference to GMail as...
If it bothers you that Microsoft's corporate name gets turned into puerile
jokes, it seems the way to counter that is to correct people when they do it.
Otherwise you're just raising the stakes of childishness. Other pe
On Apr 1, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Astrakan wrote:
> Thanx for your input.
> Ok, so Im guessing the RSA-modulus (p and q) are stored on the card
> along with the private exponents, or
> perhaps the private key in its whole, already computed?
You should take a look at http://g10code.com/docs/openpgp-card
On 4/1/11 3:51 AM, Astrakan wrote:
> Does anyone know the max storage capability of the v2.0 OpenPGP-cards? A
> few K?
>
The v2 spec says they should support at least 2048k keys. The actual
cards say they can handle up to 3072k.
--
Grant
"I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unl
> I think you are misunderstanding what I am inferring. For starters,
> that is the 5th account that I have heard or known of that was hacked
> in March alone. I am sure that the total is far higher based on a simple
> statistical accounting of the number of accounts using GMail. Happy
> Rob :)
Yo
It's unclear to me how this thread relates to gnupg. Perhaps I'm missing
something?
Doug
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 31-03-2011 20:25, Jerry escribió:
> Dumping G[censored] would have been my first choice.
I don't know why, the account compromised was from hotmail. I know
some people hate free mail providers, but sometimes they are the most
reliable choi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 01-04-2011 9:15, Jerry escribió:
...
> Personally, I consider Google's web e-mail application grossly
> insecure. I further do not trust them for one millisecond to not be
> scanning documents passing through their server(s). It would not
> surpri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 22-03-2011 13:07, Jerome Baum escribió:
...
> What stops her from sending me real messages with this kind of content?
> Even non-encrypted? I could reply "I don't know what you're talking
> about", but how does the prosecutor care? The only
11 matches
Mail list logo
