Hi, this is running in a batch. It creates a .pgp file, however that file is
empty. Any ideas?
SETLOCAL
PATH=C:\Program
Files\GNU\GnuPG;c:\encryptedfiles;c:\outgoingdropfolder;%PATH%
>"%TMP%\~encryptlist.txt" DIR /B "C:\outgoingdropfolder"
PUSHD "C:\outgoingdropfolder"
pause
FOR /F "delims=" %%
jb writes:
> Hi, this is running in a batch. It creates a .pgp file, however that file is
> empty. Any ideas?
>
> SETLOCAL
> PATH=C:\Program
> Files\GNU\GnuPG;c:\encryptedfiles;c:\outgoingdropfolder;%PATH%
>>"%TMP%\~encryptlist.txt" DIR /B "C:\outgoingdropfolder"
> PUSHD "C:\outgoingdropfol
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:58:38PM +0100 Also sprach Ingo Klöcker:
I claim that of all 4096 keys that can be found on the public keyservers
most have been created by people who just went for the highest number.
Because bigger must be better, right?
I cannot resist offering the following quote
Your out put should look like this.
"C:\encryptedfiles\%%F.pgp" %%F
From: jer...@jeromebaum.com
To: johnathan.barb...@elephant.com
Subject: Re: empty file generated when running GPG batch
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:53:23 +
CC: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
jb writes:
> Hi, this is running i
Hello
1. gpg-agent ignores changed values in ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf after
SIGHUP. I have to kill/restart him ?!
2. gpg-agent ignores "ignore-cache-for-signing" in config file. I
had to set "default-cache-ttl 0" (which is for all) ?
3. pinentry do not drag mouse(keyboard yes) even if there is no
Hi List,
there was no success in googling this question:
Is it possible to export the public part of a subkey isolated? There should be
nothing of the masterkey or other subkeys in the exported keyblock.
Situation:
www.ripe.net database is not supporting signing with subkeys. They only accept
On Mar 24, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Tom Mayer wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> there was no success in googling this question:
>
> Is it possible to export the public part of a subkey isolated? There should
> be nothing of the masterkey or other subkeys in the exported keyblock.
I'm afraid this is not possibl
On Wednesday 23 March 2011, Jerome Baum wrote:
> Ingo Klöcker writes:
> > [2. This is a digitally signed message part.asc ---
> > application/pgp-signature; signature.asc]...
>
> Hey is that a KMail feature? I really like that idea, mind if I rip
> it off, and if successful publish the code to
On Wednesday 23 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> On 23/03/2011 04:55 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> >> Enigmail allows only 1024, 2048 and 4096. I have never heard of
> >> that, but even still I would personally choose the largest key
> >> for the time
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:40, kap...@mizera.cz said:
> 1. gpg-agent ignores changed values in ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf after
> SIGHUP. I have to kill/restart him ?!
Depends on the option you want to change. Most are re-read after a HUP
or with "gpgconf --reload gpg-agent" (which of course sends a HU
Ingo Klöcker writes:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2011, Jerome Baum wrote:
>> Ingo Klöcker writes:
>> > [2. This is a digitally signed message part.asc ---
>> > application/pgp-signature; signature.asc]...
>>
>> Hey is that a KMail feature? I really like that idea, mind if I rip
>> it off, and if
11 matches
Mail list logo