-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 18 March 2011 at 5:48:47 PM, in
, Grant Olson wrote:
> Until then, I'll just use my favorite member of the sks
> pool: gingerbear.net.
Is it your favourite because of the name?
- --
Best regards
MFPAmailto:exp
On 03/19/2011 02:07 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Friday 18 March 2011 at 5:48:47 PM, in
> , Grant Olson wrote:
>
>
>> Until then, I'll just use my favorite member of the sks
>> pool: gingerbear.net.
>
> Is it your favourite because of the name?
>
>
It's just the only name I actually rememb
what are the 'sub keys' that are listed with each RSA key? Also which
type of key is preferred RSA or DSA?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hahahaha, the RSA versus DSA is a question I asked earlier this week I
believe. You might wish to rummage through the archives for that short
conversation. I would use RSA due to its ridiculous amount of sscrutiny
over the years, but be sure to set your preferences and choose a 4096
over 2048. Doin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 March 2011 at 4:39:49 PM, in
, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 14/03/11 12:32 AM, MFPA wrote:
>> Fair enough but I believe a person's desire to
>> withhold their own personal information outranks
>> another person's desire to make use of
On Mar 19, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Mike Acker wrote:
> what are the 'sub keys' that are listed with each RSA key? Also which
> type of key is preferred RSA or DSA?
OpenPGP keys are made up of a single primary key, and any number of subkeys
(including, in some cases zero). This allows the user to pi
On 3/19/11 10:34 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
> I would use RSA due to its ridiculous amount of sscrutiny over the
> years,
DSA has received comparable scrutiny, IMO. The Elgamal family (of which
DSA is a member) has an impressive pedigree.
> but be sure to set your preferences and choose a 4096 over
