Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:59:45 -0700, Paul Richard Ramer wrote: > 681 Messages sent by members of the list > 628 Encrypted messages > 36 NETMK messages > 37-41 Keys > 37-40 Members > 32 Members sent encrypted messages > 13 Members were responsible for not encrypting to someone's key > 12 Members sent

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:30:22 -0400, Faramir wrote: > El 07-08-2010 15:59, Paul Richard Ramer escribió: > ... >> So for me that makes approximately 1 in 29 encrypted messages was not >> encrypted to my key, 1 in 19 of all messages was a NETMK message, and 1 >> in 12 of all messages was either not en

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

On 8/8/2010 3:39 AM, Paul Richard Ramer wrote: > True. In fact over a third of all NETMK messages (14 to be exact) were > to members who posted fewer than ten messages in that three month period. This is expected, and it's not specific to PGPNET. Communication links that get used tend to be bett

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

On Saturday 07 August 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote: > > Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised > > *nobody* was interested. > > One person said they would use it. The overall reaction was > negative. These things happen. Sometimes, the to

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Sunday 8 August 2010 at 10:07:25 AM, in , Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Saturday 07 August 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't the >> tool they want. :) > And sometimes people think they don't want

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Saturday 7 August 2010 at 8:59:45 PM, in , Paul Richard Ramer wrote: > Well, I have some numbers to show the frequency of > NETMK (Not Encrypted To My Key) messages. I was on the > PGPNET mailing list for just over three months, and > thes

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

On 8/8/2010 10:49 AM, MFPA wrote: > How many of these 22 were within the first week or so? > I find very few messages not encrypted to mine. Again, network theory to the rescue. Generally speaking, nodes that carry little traffic are responsible for more problems than those that carry a lot. The

Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!

Just a repetition of my question, in a different way: Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a list of passphrases? Josef ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!

On 8/8/2010 12:47 PM, wegwe...@gmx.de wrote: > Just a repetition of my question, in a different way: > Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a > list of passphrases? Ten lines of Perl will do it. However, you might be waiting a really long time. If you have lost your passphras

Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!

wegwe...@gmx.de wrote on 08.08.10 18:47: > Just a repetition of my question, in a different way: > Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a > list of passphrases? nasty. http://www.vanheusden.com/nasty/ Ludwig ___ Gnupg-users mailing

Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!

http://www.roguedaemon.net/rephrase/ or google.com Cheers, Chris. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!

Hi! Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb wegwe...@gmx.de: > Just a repetition of my question, in a different way: > Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a > list of passphrases? Something called "rephrase" may be of help for you: I have no detail

Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!

On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, wrote: > Just a repetition of my question, in a different way: > Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a > list of passphrases? > I never tried it before but maybe jack the ripper might help. I've only heard of it, never tried it. There was a pr

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

Hi MFPA, Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:49:40 +0100, MFPA wrote: >> 681 Messages sent by members of the list >> 628 Encrypted messages > > I'm surprised the difference is so large - it doesn't "feel like" that > large a proportion is unencrypted. But that number not encrypted looks > correct if it includes a