Hi!
Jesse Cheung schrieb:
>> You can also use a freeform UID, which contains name and comment, but
>> leave the email field empty.
> Yeah I found it a good idea!
There is, however, a drawback to this (which is why an email address is
required by default)...
Most (email-)clients will do automati
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:36, bmea...@ieee.org said:
> through RFC 3156, but I'm still getting BAD signatures. I've tried
> verifying a couple of different signatures from various lists, and the
> example given in the RFC, but they all fail. I'm not sure what I'm
Recall that the LF *before* a MIME b
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:20, jesse200808+gpg-us...@gmail.com said:
> Yeah I found it a good idea! BTW it seems the file format doesn't
> really stop us from putting invalid email address in the UID, so is
Before doing so, you should evaluate whether it is still worth the
trouble. Without an email
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:46, mearn...@gmail.com said:
> Perhaps inelegant was a little off the mark: how about inefficient?
It is not inefficient in most cases. Public key crypto or crypting large
amounts of data takes its time and thus the overhead of fork/exec is
barely noticeable.
Checking a l
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> Yeah I found it a good idea! BTW it seems the file format doesn't
>> really stop us from putting invalid email address in the UID, so is
>
> Before doing so, you should evaluate whether it is still worth the
> trouble. Without an email address
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:20, jesse200808+gpg-us...@gmail.com said:
> Does it count if I put a human-readable address like johndoe AT
> example DOT org? I know it (in such a form) is still fairly easy to
> parse, but it's at least not as straightforward
Right, any mail program must implement such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I add a subkey to my key (e.g., because the previous one expired), do I
have to generate a new revocation certificate, or is the old one still good?
I may never need to know the answer, but better before than after the
compromise of a key.
- --
~
On 06/28/2009 04:44 PM, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> If I add a subkey to my key (e.g., because the previous one expired), do I
> have to generate a new revocation certificate, or is the old one still
> good?
I'm assuming you're asking about the revocation certificate for your
your entire GnuPG-gener
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
| On 06/28/2009 04:44 PM, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
|> If I add a subkey to my key (e.g., because the previous one expired), do I
|> have to generate a new revocation certificate, or is the old one still
|> good?
|
| I'm assum
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:09:41 +0200
Werner Koch wrote:
Hello Werner,
> mails with at lest one html part to the bitbucket.
It always puzzles me why banking organisations send html email pointing
out that "we all need to be security conscious" since html is so easily
exploited for nefarious ends.
Brad Rogers wrote:
> It always puzzles me why banking organisations send html email pointing
> out that "we all need to be security conscious" since html is so easily
> exploited for nefarious ends.
Because the bank is concerned about the bank's security, not yours. The
bank exposes itself to no
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:20, jesse200808+gpg-us...@gmail.com said:
>
>> Does it count if I put a human-readable address like johndoe AT
>> example DOT org? I know it (in such a form) is still fairly easy to
>> parse, but it's at least not as strai
12 matches
Mail list logo
