On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:19, joelcsalo...@gmail.com said:
> To rephrase my question /per/ the subject line: Is there a build of
> GnuPG 2 available for Windows?
http://www/gpg4win.org
Please wait a few days and the BETA version of Gpg4win/2 will have its
first release.
gpg4win-2.x is much large
Files received from some end user fail decryption because the embedded file
name contains a path
Here is the full response (from gpg shell)...
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID 21E81243, created 2/25/2003
"MYCOMPANY "
gpg: error creating `/SAPINTERFACES/E-SERVICES/OUT/ZEA270__FILE1':
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
>> Hm, I get a good signature here:
>
> Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>> Same here (using KMail):
>> Message was signed by tho...@bohnomat.de (Key ID: 0x61C7F5B569274BBB).
>> The signature is valid, but the key's validity is unknown.
>
> Hmm and double h
I was reading through the archives and came across this one dealing with
Hibernation and secret keys:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2009-February/035704.html
So, here is the question: Is is possible to secure gpg (or PGP or TrueCrypt for
that matter) on a Windows system?
--
Hello guys,
I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a test run
below (in bash):
$echo abcd | gpg -u b...@xyz.com --output message.pgp -r al...@123.com -se
--passphrase-fd 0 << EOF
<123456
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Michel Messerschmidt -
li...@michel-messerschmidt.de <+gpg2+maniams+878ee80e19.lists#
michel-messerschmidt...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:15:48PM +0400, gpg2.20.mani...@dfgh.net wrote:
> > 4. Sorry if this is OT or if this is a long post...
t eden wrote:
> So, here is the question: Is is possible to secure gpg (or PGP or
> TrueCrypt for that matter) on a Windows system?
The word "secure" is meaningless except in a carefully defined context.
What does "secure" mean to you? Define the word and then people can
give their own two cents
John Clizbe wrote:
> Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>>> Message was signed by tho...@bohnomat.de (Key ID: 0x61C7F5B569274BBB).
>>> The signature is valid, but the key's validity is unknown.
>>
>> Hmm and double hmm. Is there someone else using Thunderbird+Enigmail
>> that can duplicate the error message?
Hi Harry,
We ran into the same problem and the only way we were able to get
around it was by storing the pass phrase in a file and using the TYPE
command instead of the echo. Curious to see if anyone else found a
better solution
Regards,
Joe K
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Harry wrote:
>
>
On 06/18/2009 08:41 PM, Harry wrote:
> $echo abcd | gpg -u b...@xyz.com --output message.pgp -r al...@123.com -se
> --passphrase-fd 0 << EOF
> 123456
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 22:25, quoth Joe Korn:
> Hi Harry,
>
> We ran into the same problem and the only way we were able to get around it
> was by storing the pass phrase in a file and using the TYPE command instead
> of the echo. Curious to see if anyone else
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Harry wrote:
Hello guys,
I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a
test run below (in bash):
$echo abcd | gpg -u b...@xyz.com --output message.pgp -r
al...@123.com -se --passphrase-fd 0 << EOF
<123456
There is no error but after decry
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:41:11PM -0700, Harry wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a test
> run below (in bash):
Not really 100% usable yet, but the correct solution to this is the
server mode accessed via --command-fd.
IIRC VERIFY and MESSAGE
13 matches
Mail list logo
