GnuPG 2.0.12 - Linux-Ubuntu

Compiled from src under Ubuntu 9.04. $ gpg2 --version gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.12 libgcrypt 1.4.4 Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WA

Re: Documentations bugs?

Hi, Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 13:26:46, Victor Stinner a écrit : > Extract (1): > > http://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gcrypt/Controlling-the-library.h >tml GCRYCTL_USE_SECURE_RNDPOOL; Arguments: none > This command tells the PRNG to store random numbers in secure memory. This > com

GnuPG 2 under Windows

Is a build of GnuPG more recent that 1.4.9 available for Windows? —Joel Salomon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: GnuPG 2 under Windows

Joel C. Salomon wrote: > Is a build of GnuPG more recent that 1.4.9 available for Windows? Not sure why there would be. 1.4.9 is the latest release of the 1.4-STABLE branch. What is it you're looking for? Current development snapshots of what will be 1.4.10 may be built for use on Windows, but it

Re: GnuPG 2 under Windows

Joel C. Salomon wrote: > Is a build of GnuPG more recent that 1.4.9 available for Windows? If you look at http://www.gnupg.org, you will discover 1.4.9 is the latest release in the 1.4 series. There is no 1.4.10, at least not yet. ___ Gnupg-users mail

Why do people send email with an attached public key?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I see that there are some people who send their messages (especially to this list) with their messages signed via an attached signature. I can't imagine that this question hasn't been asked before, but is there an advantage to doing this vs having an i

Re: Why do people send email with an attached public key?

On Jun 20, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Steven W. Orr wrote: I see that there are some people who send their messages (especially to this list) with their messages signed via an attached signature. It is called PGP/MINE. I think the advantage is, that is more clear how to recongize a signed or encry

Re: Why do people send email with an attached public key?

Steven W. Orr wrote the following on 6/19/09 6:45 PM: > I see that there are some people who send their messages (especially to this > list) with their messages signed via an attached signature. I can't imagine > that this question hasn't been asked before, but is there an advantage to > doing this