Ok,.. my answer to this is a little bit late but here it is ... ;-)
It's not that I see a desperate need for the feature,
it just seemed an interesting omission, and I wondered
what the reason was.
I'm surprised that compatibility is a problem - I
assumed it would be done by having the self-sig
David Shaw wrote:
No, they have their own type. They are 0x19.
I should have read on before asking,.. sorry ;-)
Chris.
begin:vcard
fn:Mitterer, Christoph Anton
n:Mitterer;Christoph Anton
org:Munich University of Applied Sciences;Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
adr;quoted-pri
Hi.
Took a while but now I've time to answer.
David Shaw wrote:
Ah,... I see,.. but is this problem only limited to signing subkeys? It
should be, right? Because the primary is protected by the selfsigned
user id? Or is there another reason? (just want to check if I'm slowly
understand how
I've just found out that 0x19 is not specified by rfc2440...
Isn't that a dangerous way if gnupg add its own things to it?
Chris.
begin:vcard
fn:Mitterer, Christoph Anton
n:Mitterer;Christoph Anton
org:Munich University of Applied Sciences;Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
adr;quote
Hi.
When I use an USB token instead of a "normal" smartcard reader do I
still need special software (e.g. pcscd and so on) or is gnupg enough.
Best wishes,
Chris.
begin:vcard
fn:Mitterer, Christoph Anton
n:Mitterer;Christoph Anton
org:Munich University of Applied Sciences;Department of Mathema
Ivan Boldyrev wrote:
Which SSH implementation does support it? It seems OpenSSH does not
(at least I can't understand how to do it).
I think you can do it via gpg-agent. Unfortunately I couldn't find any
documentation right now. :-(
Chris.
begin:vcard
fn:Mitterer, Christoph Anton
n:Mitter