On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:55:29 +0100, Philipp Kern said:
> Yeah, I got that fact. So to clarify: A USB token with a supported
> smartcard in it.
You may try to cut an OpenPGP card to ID-000 size.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
David Shaw wrote:
And what is the "theory" behind them,... e.g. how do they improve security?
Current signing subkeys have a weakness in that they can be moved from
one key to another without the key owner's approval.
This means that if I sign a message with a signing subkey, someone
else
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
>
> >>And what is the "theory" behind them,... e.g. how do they improve
> >>security?
> >>
> >>
> >Current signing subkeys have a weakness in that they can be moved from
> >one key to another without
David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>
>snip>
>
>>btw: You remember my C-only thread (I'll answer you lastest posts
>>soon),... I played around a bit and read some parts of rfc2440.
>>Ok when I split a key using gpgsplit I get about the fo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
> > 0x1F signatures are truly signing a key alone.
> >
> >
>
> So is a backsig of type 0x1F then??
No, they have their own type. They are 0x19.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@g
