RE: Automatically encrypt and sign outgoing mail

2005-10-25 Thread Faine, Mark
This looks good but it is a windows program. I'm trying to achieve the same goal as GPGrelay provides but on Linux. Basically I'm trying to ensure that all the mail sent out from the Linux box (admin mail) that is sent over an insecure mail server is sent to me encrypted. I had thought to use pr

Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread Alphax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing: gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket gpg: signature packet without keyid gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket gpg: signature packet without timestamp gpg

Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 25/10/2005, Alphax disait > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing: > > gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket > gpg: signature packet without keyid > gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket > gpg: buffer shorter than su

Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote: > Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing: > > gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket > gpg: signature packet without keyid > gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket > gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket > gpg: signature packet

Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread Alphax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 David Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote: > >>Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing: >> >>gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket >>gpg: signature packet without keyid >>gpg: buffer shorter than

Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread David Shaw
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:08:55AM +0930, Alphax wrote: > David Shaw wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote: > > > >>Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing: > >> > >>gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket > >>gpg: signature packet without keyid > >>g

Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread Doug Barton
Erwan David wrote: > Le Tue 25/10/2005, Alphax disait > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA256 >> >>Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing: >> >>gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket >>gpg: signature packet without keyid >>gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket >>gpg

Using a Smartcard with a class2 cardreader: Can I use the keypad?

2005-10-25 Thread Peter Engel
Hi, I have a class-2 cardreader (meaning: with integreated keypad for entering the PIN). I found no clue yet wether GnuPG supports the integrated keypad for entering the PIN. (using GnuPG v.1.4.2) Is it possible? Will it be possible in a future version? Thanks for any usefull answers, Peter --

Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:49:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > I got this when I retrieved the PGP GD key via hkp. > > REmoving this key from my keyring was enough to suppress those > > messages. > > I had a similar problem with the version of the key that I received from > hkp. I downloaded th

Re: Delete key from keyserver

2005-10-25 Thread Alex Mauer
David Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote: > > > I don't agree with this. The user ID system in all OpenPGP products > gives a regular UTF-8 string. Signatures simply bind that string to > the primary key. The system says exactly "Alex Mauer belongs with ke

Re: Delete key from keyserver

2005-10-25 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:22:10PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote: > David Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote: > > > > > > I don't agree with this. The user ID system in all OpenPGP products > > gives a regular UTF-8 string. Signatures simply bind that string to

Re: Delete key from keyserver

2005-10-25 Thread Alex Mauer
David Shaw wrote: Some people (myself included) check both before signing. The name via some sort of formal ID, and the email via a mail challenge. As do I, at least for a level 3 signature. Still, if you don't want to bind both tokens together, just create an user ID of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Delete key from keyserver

2005-10-25 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:50:11PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote: > David Shaw wrote: > >Some people (myself included) check both before signing. The name via > >some sort of formal ID, and the email via a mail challenge. > > As do I, at least for a level 3 signature. > > >Still, if you don't want to