On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:03:46 +0200, Joost van Baal said:
> I am having troubles getting S/MIME emails (or CMS blobs) processed by
> GPGME. (Since GPGME uses libksba, it _should_ be able to handle these,
> I guess).
Yes, it does.
> For instance, when creating a detached-signed S/MIME email messa
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:13:51AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:03:46 +0200, Joost van Baal said:
>
> > I am having troubles getting S/MIME emails (or CMS blobs) processed by
> > GPGME.
> Check out how Mutt does it. In particular the file crypt-gpgme.c from
> the 1.5.x seri
B. Kuestner wrote:
Coming as a newbie to all of this, I'd say there's a long way to go
until this whole thing is ready for my Mom to use it. And I think
that's what we eventually want to do, right? That encrypted messaging
becomes the norm, not the exception.
Public key systems that atte
If anything needs to change it is that the documentation
I can more and more see that thanks to everybody's willingness on
this list to explain.
That is exactly my point, NOBODY should rely on ANY of that
information to
identify a key. The only identifier for a key is the fingerprint.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> And the final 'objection' is more of a philosophical one: what is IDENTITY?
> If I know a person only by email, then that email *is* the person to me.
> And I know many people just by email and we are probably never going to
> meet IRL, except for some strange coincid
I've configured system account mail (root, postmaster, etc) to be sent
to a user account and then that user account is using a .forward file to
send the mail to my workstation where I can review it. I would like to
do the same but include an encrypt/sign step into the process.
I have created m
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
> The UID format is also problematic IMO. GPG (OpenPGP?) strongly
> "wants" to have a Name and an email address for each UID. I think
> that this puts emphasis in a bad place, leading people to be signing
> the fact that e.g. "Alex Maue
Faine, Mark wrote:
> I've configured system account mail (root, postmaster, etc) to be sent
> to a user account and then that user account is using a .forward file to
> send the mail to my workstation where I can review it. I would like to
> do the same but include an encrypt/sign step into the pr
Perhaps the best approach to this is a simple script.
gpg --encrypt --recipient %2 --output %1.pgp %1
You could expand on it. Shouldn't be a problem for
any environment.
--- Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most often, recipients of my encrypted files are
> users of legacy
