On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:45:02AM -, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> > Just say no to inline PGP!
>
> Some reasons I use inline:
>
> * My email has a much better chance of reaching people whose
> systems bounce (or discard!) attachments.
Are there really a lot of such systems? I've encounte
Chris De Young schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:45:02AM -, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
>>>Just say no to inline PGP!
>>
>>Some reasons I use inline:
>>
> I see your points, but in my opinion they aren't worth giving up the
> benefits of MIME -- especially in what one hopes will be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> Points taken - Have you ever looked at an signed (using MIME) message in
> OutlookExpress? RRR .
>
>
> Thomas
>
Sorry, I've never used Lookout.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Prefer
Alphax schrieb:
> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
>
>>>Points taken - Have you ever looked at an signed (using MIME) message in
>>>OutlookExpress? RRR .
>
> Sorry, I've never used Lookout.
The attachment is a snapshoot of David Srbecky's recent MIME signed post
"Re: Extra information in public
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
Alphax schrieb:
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
Points taken - Have you ever looked at an signed (using MIME) message in
OutlookExpress? RRR .
Sorry, I've never used Lookout.
The attachment is a snapshoot of David Srbecky's recent MIME signed post
"Re: Extra infor
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:34:33 +0200, Marco d'Itri said:
> How does this interact with DKIM?
DKIM does not work. For example, their canonicalization is broken and
one can easily fake a MIME message.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
Gnupg-users mailing li
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:43:40 +0200, Thomas Kuehne said:
> OutlookExpress displays the message just like Mozilla or KMail without
> encryption plugins.
Use a MIME compliant MUA and not such a spam/DoS/virus vector.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
Gnupg-
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:33:24PM +0200, Tobias Eichert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have multiple self signatures within my key and I haven't
> found a reason yet. I usually don't self-sign my key several
> times (well, at least I'm not aware of it). :)
>
> http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?o
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:33:07PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 04:15:47PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > After adding some keys recently, I always get:
> [snip]
> > gpg: mpi larger than indicated length (2 bytes)
> > gpg: keyring_get_keyblock: read error: i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, David Srbecky wrote:
[snip]
> And the content might look like this:
>
> First name=David
> Last name=Srbecky
> Country=Czech Republic
> City=Usti nad Labem
> Telephone=+65 536 1024
> ICQ=#128-256-512
> Homepage url=http://www.gnupg.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Me, too. :-/ I completely emptied my public keyring, one key at a time,
looking for the damage and never found it. Eventually I renamed the empty
file away and built a new one, and now I have no more trouble.
I don't know whether a keyring file is su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> * My email has a much better chance of reaching people whose
>> systems bounce (or discard!) attachments.
> Are there really a lot of such systems? I've encountered very few
> that bounce messages with attachments, and if they discard attachment
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
I should have said "whose systems bounce (or discard!) emails with
attachments."
I can say that I've worked in such company. Oddly enough, the server
seemed to strip only the application/pgp, or whatever the MIME type is,
replacing it with some bogus MS-TNEF attachme
Hi,
How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
E.g. keys like these:
sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory Verification Key
Folkert van Heusden
--
Auto te koop, zie: http://www.vanheusden.com/daihatsu.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
In reply to Greg Sabino Mullane's message sent 2005-08-09 11:26:
* My email has a much better chance of reaching people whose
systems bounce (or discard!) attachments.
>
>>> Are there really a lot of such systems? I've encountered ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
In reply to Folkert van Heusden's message sent 2005-08-09 12:22:
> How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
> E.g. keys like these:
> sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory Verification Key
Stand in
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
> E.g. keys like these:
> sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory Verification Key
gpg --edit-key (your key)
clean
David
_
> > How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
> > E.g. keys like these:
> > sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory Verification Key
> gpg --edit-key (your key)
> clean
Doesn't work:
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --edit-key 1f28d8ae
...
Secret key is avail
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 6:41:14 PM, Michael wrote:
>> How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
>> E.g. keys like these:
>> sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory Verification Key
>
> Stand in the feature request line ;-)
It's already i
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:10:02PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
> > > E.g. keys like these:
> > > sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory Verification Key
> > gpg --edit-key (your key)
> > clean
>
> Do
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 6:41:14 PM, Michael wrote:
> >> How can I remove revoked and/or expired signatures from my public key?
> >> E.g. keys like these:
> >> sig X CA57AD7C 2005-07-15 PGP Global Directory
ME can look really nasty too. That's I would prefer to save the
signature in the mail headers.
David Srbecky
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
U
; >
> > OutlookExpress displays the message just like Mozilla or KMail without
> > encryption plugins.
>
> Sorry for that. I do not know that happened. (Could it be some misuse of
> "Edit as New..."?)
>
> I do not use inline because I find the extra stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hallo bin auf diesem sektor noch absolut blank aber irgendwie funzt
das eingeben der befehle nicht habe gnu1.4.2 und ich muß doch eingeben
gpg_--list-keys aber dann nach [enter] erfolgt keine reaktion auf
diesen befehl. was mach ich nun falsch
mfg hol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there everyone,
It seems I got into an issue with the key for this account. I've
signed this e-mail, and you'll probably notice it's a bad key. So, I
want to remove it, and create a new one. My question is this. Do I
revoke it first, then de
David Srbecky schrieb:
> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
>
>> Alphax schrieb:
>>
>>
>>> Thomas Kuehne wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Points taken - Have you ever looked at an signed (using MIME)
> message in
> OutlookExpress? RRR .
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I've never used Lookout.
>>
>>
>>
>> The attach
Patrick Dickey wrote:
Hi there everyone,
It seems I got into an issue with the key for this account. I've
signed this e-mail, and you'll probably notice it's a bad key. So, I
want to remove it, and create a new one. My question is this. Do I
revoke it first, then delete it? And, can I do
> I primarily use inlined PGP because I'm tired of having my S/MIME signed
> mail bounced back to me as undeliverable because "pkcs7 signature is
> listed as a dangerous attachment on this server". What's so dangerous
> about a S/MIME signature?! Apparently, it's the same danger that's
> present in
David Srbecky wrote:
>I do not use inline because I find the extra stuff annoying. However,
>MIME can look really nasty too. That's I would prefer to save the
>signature in the mail headers.
That would be easy to do in a X-PGP-Signature header or something similar.
The X- headers are free to us
Curious, anyone know how many passwords/second that gets?
On 8/10/05, Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is not too long (too many characters), try 'nasty':
> http://www.vanheusden.com/nasty/
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:10:20PM +0530, Thutika, Srinivas (ODC - Satyam)
> wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Patrick
Patrick Dickey wrote:
> Hi there everyone,
>It seems I got into an issue with the key for this account. I've
> signed this e-mail, and you'll probably notice it's a bad key.
Shows up as good to me...
UNTRUSTED Good signature from Pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>Note that signature revocation certificates themselves are _not_
>>removed (= still show up on "check"), only the corresponding
>>signatures.
Is it possible to remove a revocation certificate?
Regards,
Raymond
- -=-=-
... ((Politic
32 matches
Mail list logo
