Re: Proof of email ownership

Hi! Let me note that I am currently working on a simplified key validation scheme. The basic idea is to connect a signature to an DNS entry. Our assumption is that DNS is secure and unforgeable - as of now it is not but eventually DNSSEC will get deployed to solve this and many other problems.

Re: Save signature in mail headers

On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 23:43:00 +0200, David Srbecky said: > I would like to sign all my mail, but I do not want to annoy people that > have incompatible e-mail clients with extra attachment file or signature > in the text of the message. There are at least three reasons against this: 1. It is hard

Re: Proof of email ownership

How would this work out for people who do not have control over the DNS record of domains? Best examples are free email services like hotmail and gmail? -SK --- Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Let me note that I am currently working on a > simplified key validation > scheme.

Re: Proof of email ownership

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Werner Koch wrote: > Hi! > > Let me note that I am currently working on a simplified key validation > scheme. The basic idea is to connect a signature to an DNS entry. > > Our assumption is that DNS is secure and unforgeable - as of now it is >

Feature request: Detect whether recipient has a public key

Related to: Save signature in mail headers Is it possible to send the signature in mail headers? Ok, I got other solution: I think it is safe to assume that if user has public key than he has compatible MUA or at least he will not mind being send signatures. What I want is option to try impor

Feature request: Show Photo ID

Hello, How difficult is it to show Photo ID if available? See http://tecwizards.de/mozilla/messagefaces/header-example.png David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Feature request: Automatically import public keys

Hello, Enigmail is great, but I find that public key import is very repetitive and unnecessary action. Could Enigmail just try to import public keys automatically for incoming mail? David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lis

Feature request: Import public keys for all contacts in the address book

This could be especially useful for new users. (Like me :-) ) David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Feature request: Show whether e-mail of user is verified

Related to: Proof of email ownership There are a few robots that verify that user owns the e-mail. There are a many more UNTRUSTED IDs than TRUSTED in my list. If enigmail could specify whether the ID has been signed by robot, it would provide significantly more information. PS: A configurable l

Feature requests: SORRY!!! - WRONG maillist

I very sorry!! I had a very creative moment, but I did not realize that I am sending mails to the wrong maillist - I should stop using "Edit As New..." :-( Sorry!!! David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org

more than one message digest per signed message?

Is it possible to use more than one message digest when signing a message with GnuPG? gpg --digest MD5 --digest SHA512 --clearsign test.txt -> used digest SHA512 gpg --digest MD5,SHA512 --clearsign test.txt -> gpg: selected digest algorithm is invalid gpg --digest "MD5 SHA512" --clearsign test.t

Re: Proof of email ownership

Werner Koch wrote: > gpg -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]@example.org foo This parts looks good... > gpg detects that foo.gpg has the notation key pka-address at gnupg.org > and takes its value (werner at example.org) to run a DNS query like: > > $ host -t txt werner._pka.example.org > werner._pka.ex

new (2005-08-07) keyanalyze results (+sigcheck)

New keyanalyze results are available at: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/2005-08-07/ Signatures are now being checked using keyanalyze+sigcheck: http://dtype.org/~aaronl/ Earlier reports are also available, for comparison: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/ Even earlier month