Re: Proof of email ownership

On 8/6/05, Samuel ]slund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:36:49PM +0200, David Srbecky wrote: > > Hello, > Keywords you are looking for include "web of thrust" and "key signing". > Did you mean to say "web of thrust"? Kind of funny that image. Adam -- http://www.monk

Re: Proof of email ownership

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:36:02AM +0100, Adam Cripps wrote: > On 8/6/05, Samuel ]slund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:36:49PM +0200, David Srbecky wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Keywords you are looking for include "web of thrust" and "key signing". > > > > Did you mean to

Re: Leave clearsigned content encoding alone, how?

Richard Sperry wrote: >What I am wondering is if we can simply UUencode attachments, leave them >alone and clear sign the whole message. Yes. However, AFAIK base64 is the default for attachments, and uuencode does have some problems with (now probably antique and not used any more) mail servers.

Re: Proof of email ownership

Hello, Thank you all you for you replys! That's exactly what I was looking for! Thank you, David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Leave clearsigned content encoding alone, how?

Johan Wevers wrote: I read my own email usually in text mode screens, with the IBM 850 charset. MIME headers can't change that anyway... Same here, but in addition, in my general-purpose inbox, I reject all HTML messages and messages with attachments on the assumption they are spam. Preponder