Secret Key UID Missing

2005-05-25 Thread imacat
Dear all, I have got into trouble. Here is my key now: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % gpg --edit imacat gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.1; Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain cond

Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash

2005-05-25 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
Hi > >This also illustrates some problems with the system, namely hash >collisions (two people generate the hash "baz") > I thought that two *non* identical names - as in case below will *not* create the same hash If it will, what is the probability ? Thanks Subu Alex Mauer - [EMAIL PROT

Re: Help with Enigmail and other issues

2005-05-25 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David Thanks for replying to my message As of now I'e progressed a little bit and Enigmail is working fine I've got the following on my gpg.onf file which greatly improve enigmail's ability to search for keys (my copy at least !) keyserver ra

Re: KMail and smartcard - what is a "stub" secret key ?

2005-05-25 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
On Wed, 25 May 2005 00:59:35 -0700, gpg 20 subu said: > I thought that If I keep my keyring on a USB drive, there would be *no > trace of it* on the Hard Disk I was talking about smart cards and not about USB drives. They have nothing in common. Shalom-Salam, Werner _

Re: KMail and smartcard - what is a "stub" secret key ?

2005-05-25 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
Hi! Please immediately stop rewritting my address to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and thus assigning me a different identity. Shalom-Salam, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: KMail and smartcard

2005-05-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:36:13 +0200, Chris said: > I have removed the ~/.gnupg directory and issued "gpg --card-status" again. > "gpg -K" does still not list anyting... What version of gpg are you using? Shalom-Salam, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mai

Re: RC2

2005-05-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:10:04 +0200, Alexander Hoffmann said: > Hello, > i don't know if it is the best place to ask this type of questions, but > if i'm wrong here could you tell me a right mailing list fot it. > I want to decrypt rrc2 encrypted mails and use libgcrypt for this > purpose. As i kno

Re: KMail and smartcard

2005-05-25 Thread Chris
I am using: gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.0 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the file COPYING for details. Home: ~/.gnupg Supported algorithms: Pubkey: RSA

Unicode support

2005-05-25 Thread Sascha Kiefer
Hi list, Assume, i have a mail text body; it's charset is something other than us-ascii. Does it work (have not tried it yet) to convert the data to utf-8 and then signing it armored? Regards, --esskar ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg

Re: KMail and smartcard

2005-05-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 25 May 2005 12:51:34 +0200, Chris said: > gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.0 Noteworthy changes in version 1.4.1 (2005-03-15) * When running a --card-status or --card-edit and a public key is available, missing secret key stubs will be created o

Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash Functions

2005-05-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Sean C.: > The I.B.M. software would convert data on a person into a string of seemingly > random characters, using a technique known as a one-way hash function. No > names, addresses or Social Security numbers, for example, would be embedded > within the character string. For most applications

Re: RC2

2005-05-25 Thread Johan Wevers
Alexander Hoffmann wrote: >purpose. As i know the RC2 algorithm is implemented in libgcrypt >(rfc2268.c), but it will not be compiled (i concluded it from >"libgcrypt-config --algorithms" output). What should i do to get the RC2 >algorithm compiled? >I use libgcrypt-1.2.1 I don't know libgcrypt,

Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash

2005-05-25 Thread Alex Mauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I thought that two *non* identical names - as in case below will *not* > create the same hash > If it will, what is the probability ? The probability of this happening is extremely low. For a 128-bit hash, such as md5, the probability is 1 in 2^128 (1 in 340,282,366,92

Re: Help with Enigmail and other issues

2005-05-25 Thread =k3Rn=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! > As of now I'e progressed a little bit and Enigmail is working fine > > I've got the following on my gpg.onf file which greatly improve > enigmail's ability to search for keys (my copy at least !) > > keyserver random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de >

Re: Help with Enigmail and other issues

2005-05-25 Thread Alex Mauer
=k3Rn= wrote: > What does these options really have to do with Enigmail's work? Does > this auto-key-retrieve have any effect on Enigmail? It allows Engimail to import the key used to sign a mail without prompting. -Alex Mauer "Hawke" signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: Secret Key UID Missing

2005-05-25 Thread imacat
Well, after some hacking, I think I'd found the answer to manuplate the secret key UID now. I think this worths sharing. It may not be the intension of the authors, but at the meanwhile while secret key UID management is not available, this should provide some solution. This method should wo

Minnesota court takes dim view of encryption

2005-05-25 Thread Shatadal
From http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html "A Minnesota appeals court has ruled that the presence of encryption software on a computer may be viewed as evidence of criminal intent." ___ Gnupg-users mai

Re: Minnesota court takes dim view of encryption

2005-05-25 Thread Robert Zagarello
What? You expect the age of enlightenment? You forget who's President. Usually when the head stinks the fish is not far behind. BZAG === --- Shatadal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From > http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-571897

Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash Functions

2005-05-25 Thread Alex L. Mauer
Florian Weimer wrote: * Sean C.: The I.B.M. software would convert data on a person into a string of seemingly random characters, using a technique known as a one-way hash function. No names, addresses or Social Security numbers, for example, would be embedded within the character string. F

Re: Minnesota court takes dim view of encryption

2005-05-25 Thread Joseph Oreste Bruni
Last time I checked, the President doesn't appoint judges in Minnesota, the Governor does. On May 25, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Robert Zagarello wrote: What? You expect the age of enlightenment? You forget who's President. Usually when the head stinks the fish is not far behind.

Re: Minnesota court takes dim view of encryption

2005-05-25 Thread Robert Zagarello
So? Minnesota isn't undergoing the same nonsense as the rest of the country? You underestimate your red state colleagues' influence in ANY state. --- Joseph Oreste Bruni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last time I checked, the President doesn't appoint > judges in > Minnesota, the Governor does.

Re: Unicode support

2005-05-25 Thread David Shaw
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:30:22PM +0200, Sascha Kiefer wrote: > Hi list, > > Assume, i have a mail text body; it's charset is something other than > us-ascii. > Does it work (have not tried it yet) to convert the data to utf-8 and > then signing it armored? GPG doesn't really care very much ab