On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:53:47 +0200, Dirk Traulsen said:
> This sounds interesting. Please help me to clarify it a bit.
> After some tests and reading in my understanding it works like this:
[1...7]
Correct.
> When system2 would be cracked, an attacker would not have access to
> the secret part
Ulf Jaenicke-Rler, wrote:
>You might need to install the Win95 Winsock2 Update. Try to google for
>"Win95 winsock update" and download it from Microsoft.
I'll try to find it. The machine in question has no internet connection
so windows update won't work.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Under Cygwin I get the next error message:
gpg --card-edit
gpg: apdu_open_reader: failed to open driver `libpcsclite.so': dlopen,
Win32 error 126
gpg: card reader not available
gpg: OpenPGP card not available: general error
I tried installin
Hi Werner,
Sorry for disturbing u again.. Iam facing problem in --sign-keys for 1.4.1.
When I used the --sign-key in 1.2.x it is generating sig 3 keys as below
But I am not getting the sig 3 keys in 1.4.1.
1.4.1 is having any problem in --sign-key
Regards,
Srinivas.
-Original Message
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 01:47:36AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> Il /25 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it is possible to run the keyserver helpers not just by their
> >> name, but by their *enti
Werner Koch wrote:
> That keyserver as well as all other servers running the old HKS
> software are broken. YOu should move away from that keyserver and use
> an SKS one (e.g. random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de) or at least those at
> subkeys.pgp.net.
Thanks very much for the information. I was n
Steve M. Fabac, Jr. wrote:
[..snip..]
PS, I downloaded gnupg 1.2 pre-compiled and installed it and used it
to run the gpg commands above.
Only for the sake of curiosity: you've downloaded gpg 1.2
for the only
purpose of verifying the source of gpg 1.4.1 or you've
received it
trough a secure veri
Il /31 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
[...]
>> > Can you try this patch?
>>
>> Of course! I have tried and it seems it is working OK!
>
> Excellent. Thanks for testing.
Not at all, David. I am always glad to be helpful.
> I've put the fix in for 1.4.2.
Excellent. Thanks for fixing! ;-)
