+#include
+
+#define NAME "Socket"
+#define DATA "Test npth socket interfaces. . ."
+
+static void *
+thread_one (void *arg)
+{
+int sock, msgsock, rval;
+struct sockaddr_un server;
+char buf[1024];
+ struct timeval tv;
+ struct timespec ts;
+
+
ead above is 'Re: What's Up Johnny? --
> Covert Content Attacks on Email End-to-End Encryption' and it contains
> some leftover attack cases that didn't make it into the Efail paper. It
> aims at exfiltrating the plaintext of encrypted mails, but with some
> degree of user
ases that didn't make it into the Efail paper. It
aims at exfiltrating the plaintext of encrypted mails, but with some
degree of user interaction, e.g. replying to a malicious email.
Lots of test cases and I am not aware of any current list of what MUA
fixed which issue (correctly o
Sebastian Schinzel wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Jens Müller just gave a talk at DEFCON about Covert Content Attacks
> against S/MIME and OpenPGP encryption and digital signatures in the
> email context. He just published the PoC emails that he used in the talk
> and they might be useful for further tes
Dear all,
Jens Müller just gave a talk at DEFCON about Covert Content Attacks
against S/MIME and OpenPGP encryption and digital signatures in the
email context. He just published the PoC emails that he used in the talk
and they might be useful for further testing.
https://github.com/RUB-NDS/Cover
David wrote:
> I have imported your key,
:-)
Regards
Stefan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 14/07/2019 05:55, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> David wrote:
>
>> Hello Stefan,
>>
>> I mean to say - no keys were found :)
>
> Maybe you have to adjust you settings.
>
> My key is available via WKD or Hagrid.
>
> (P.S. I forgot to insert a Message-ID,
> so now threading is not corre
David wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I mean to say - no keys were found :)
Maybe you have to adjust you settings.
My key is available via WKD or Hagrid.
(P.S. I forgot to insert a Message-ID,
so now threading is not correct.)
Regards
Stefn
___
Gnupg-us
On 13/07/2019 17:56, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> David wrote:
>
Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :)
But not signed :) no public key
David
>
> And a little reply, to see if my signature verifies properly.
>
> S
On 13/07/2019 17:45, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> David wrote:
>
>> Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :)
>
>> But not signed :) no public key
>
>> David
>
> And a little reply, to see if my signature verifies properly.
>
> Step 1. Creating the reply in Notepad++ (offline).
>
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> David wrote:
>
> > Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :)
> >
> > But not signed :) no public key
> >
> > David
>
> And a little reply, to see if my signature verifies properly.
>
> Step 1. Cr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David wrote:
> Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :)
>
> But not signed :) no public key
>
> David
And a little reply, to see if my signature verifies properly.
Step 1. Creating the reply in Notepad++ (offline).
Step 2. Signing the mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David wrote:
> Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :)
>
> But not signed :) no public key
>
> David
And a little reply, to see if my signature verifies properly.
Step 1. Creating the reply in Notepad++ (offline).
Step 2. Signing the mess
Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :)
But not signed :) no public key
David
--
People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government
Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION
Becomes A DUTY! Join the Rebellion Today! https://gbenet.com
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
My reply to Wiktor came not through yet, so let's
see if this message makes it.
Regards
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iHUEARYIAB0WIQTsFcZEw1lI/LR+FYmaI04LDh8f6AUCXCfYvwAKCRCaI04LDh8f
6I4xAQDz4bG/GayV/Kcb0ZRxo728Ddu9pOnZpf3WpY3MiYxmgQEAw1Pa5b
Error: Test failure: Testing protocol disengaged.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Paul H. Hentze wrote:
> test
>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
test
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
At Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:01:45 +0200 (CEST),
wrote:
> I am using GnuPG 1.4.x to symmetrically encrypt files before I
> transfer them to "the cloud" for backup reasons.
> Is there any way to test these encrypted files for errors, i.e. to
> make sure they can be decrypted corr
Hi!
On 22/07/17 00:01, karel-...@tutanota.com wrote:
> In short I am searching for something like the test option for packed
> files that most archivers offer.
I don't know what OS you're using, so the details might differ but this
works for me:
$ gpg --batch -o /dev/null -d tes
Hello!I am using GnuPG 1.4.x to symmetrically encrypt files before I transfer
them to "the cloud" for backup reasons.Is there any way to test these encrypted
files for errors, i.e. to make sure they can be decrypted correctly without
actually having to decrypt them again?Pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 29 May 2017 at 2:18:18 PM, in
, Marcus
Brinkmann via Gnupg-users wrote:-
> For people who want to communicate with other people
> rather than bots,
> there is also this:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/GPGpractice/
> https://www.reddit.c
d message from
> someone I didn't know and had never heard of signed with a signature for
> which no public key was available.
>
> When I saw the email with a subject "test, test, hello" (or something to
> that effect" I decided not to let Thunderbird/Enigmail p
Hi list,
When I checked my email this morning I had an encrypted message from
someone I didn't know and had never heard of signed with a signature for
which no public key was available.
When I saw the email with a subject "test, test, hello" (or something to
that effect"
On March 11, 2017 12:27:25 PM EST, Werner Koch wrote:
>The reason for this is that some mail sites now have a DMARC reject
>policy which leads to a bounce for all subscribers whose mail provider
>honors this DMARC policy - for example gmail. After a few bounces
>message delivery to those subscri
> Just a simple test message as asked by Werner to test somethingâ¦
List owner[s] could ask for test@ lists to be added on domains:
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/ # gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ # mailman-us...@python.org
Examples
licy is
is advertised.
The problem with this rewriting is that it breaks quoting. For example
here is how I would have replied to Jeff's test mail:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:02, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> Just a simple test message as asked by Werner to test something…
Thank
Just a simple test message as asked by Werner to test something…
Jeff
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 01/05/2017 12:35 AM, Roger wrote:
> Test mail to mailing list testing GNUPG signing, appearance and hopefully
> conforming to mailing list standards.
I received your post to the list. I also verified a good signature.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Ingo Kl?cker wrote:
>On Thursday 05 January 2017 15:56:18 Roger wrote:
>> Great. However I had no idea my mailing list post finally made it to
>> the mailing list, as the mailing list did not send a copy of my post;
>> even though this option is activate
On Thursday 05 January 2017 15:56:18 Roger wrote:
> Great. However I had no idea my mailing list post finally made it to
> the mailing list, as the mailing list did not send a copy of my post;
> even though this option is activated within the mailing list
> settings.
As others have pointed out in
rote:
>Got it...
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 12:35 AM, Roger wrote:
>>
>> Test mail to mailing list testing GNUPG signing, appearance and hopefully
>> conforming to mailing list standards.
&
Test mail to mailing list testing GNUPG signing, appearance and hopefully
conforming to mailing list standards.
--
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:10, du...@nofroth.com said:
> Once I have completed my OS upgrade how do I restore my keys and the
> trust levels assigned to them?
If you restore the backup of ~/.gnupg (with all sub directories) with
the right permissions (tar xpf) you should be done. GnuPGnstores all
it
On Thu 2016-09-15 15:32:32 -0400, MFPA wrote:
> And if they are accidentally sent to a keyserver, does the keyserver
> strip them because they are marked as non-exportable?
It should but the current sks keyservers do not do this right, and an
attempt to fix this has been stalled for years:
http
> Does exporting local signatures make it somehow more likely they might be
> accidentally sent to a keyserver?
No.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 15 September 2016 at 3:32:22 PM, in
, Robert J.
Hansen wrote:-
> But I agree with Daniel that it's important to include those
> options if you have local signatures on your keyring.
Does exporting local signatures make it somehow more
> I am unable to find any references in man to export-local in
> - --export-options except for export-local-sigs. Maybe this is an
> undocumented parameter to the --export-options option? What is it
> supposed to do?
--export-local is the same as --export-local-sigs. Likewise with
--import-loca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16-09-14 05:24 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Thanks for the very thorough walk-through, Robert.
>
> Perhaps GnuPG ought to produce some kind of interchangeable backup
> automatically on its own that it can re-consume, so this kind of
> inv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16-09-14 04:01 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I am relatively new to GNUPG so my apologies in advance if this
>> question
> is
>> trivial.
>
> Welcome! And your question is not trivial.
>
> The following is the procedure I use on UNIX systems
Also how to handle the tofu.db? A quick check doesn't find any
--import-tofu or --export-tofu options. Does a simple backup and
transfer of tofu.db suffice? --Murphy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
G
On 09/14/2016 06:31 PM, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello Duane,
>
>> How can I make sure my private key and trust assignments were copied
>> properly?
> for me in the past taking a backup of .gnupg was sufficient. However you
> can also export your secret key using:
>
> gpg --export-secret-keys -a
Thanks for the very thorough walk-through, Robert.
Perhaps GnuPG ought to produce some kind of interchangeable backup
automatically on its own that it can re-consume, so this kind of
involved process isn't necessary.
A couple notes below:
On Wed 2016-09-14 15:01:47 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I am relatively new to GNUPG so my apologies in advance if this question
is
> trivial.
Welcome! And your question is not trivial.
The following is the procedure I use on UNIX systems:
First, export all public certificates into a public keyring:
$ gpg --armor --export > pub.asc
Secon
Hello Duane,
> How can I make sure my private key and trust assignments were copied
> properly?
for me in the past taking a backup of .gnupg was sufficient. However you
can also export your secret key using:
gpg --export-secret-keys -a > secret.asc
And the manual trust assignments by doing:
g
how to do it properly to begin
with.
I've just copied my .gnupg directory to a usb key as a backup measure,
which I found as a method (more or less) on
http://www.glump.net/content/gpg_intro/. I am planning on upgrading
my OS and I need to test this backup. How can I make sure my private
ke
urses.org/comprehension-test/
I hope many of you find that useful (for new users, not for yourselves).
Hauke
--
Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/
http://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread
OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
sign
would like to be noticed so that I can set a link to the other
versions).
The Germans here may find it useful if they teach others how to use
OpenPGP. I am interested in the experiences you gain with it (for
improving the test).
Hauke
--
Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer
I sent myself a post and signed it. The icon for the signed message
stays red (I seem to remember on my old Mandriva box it would be green
if valid). Clicking the icon the output shows:
gpg: using character set `utf-8'
gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
:signature p
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:38, ca+gn...@esmtp.org said:
> This patch (hack?) fixes it for me (local timezone is PDT).
I changed the test to use timegm and only if that is missing I use this
patch.
Thanks,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesges
On OpenBSD 5.3 i386 one test fails:
t-timestuff.c:118: test 17 failed
FAIL: t-timestuff
This patch (hack?) fixes it for me (local timezone is PDT).
--- t-timestuff.c- Mon Jun 23 19:33:25 2014
+++ t-timestuff.c Mon Jun 23 19:33:38 2014
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
(void)argc;
(void)argv
Greetings,
So, I'm slowly building a test suite of pgp mime for:
https://github.com/timprepscius/mv
If you'd like to help out, please send a mail
(encrypted/signed/signed+encrypted/html/just-text/attachment/etc,etc/whatever-you-would-like)
to:
g...@pmx.mooo.com
g's publ
Is there a test suite of pgp mime messages somewhere in the source code?
-tim
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
It looks like the initial guess (not my guess) is correct as my
test shows (message from TeamSpeaK USA to me)
http://www.securemecca.com/tmp/TeamSpeakUSA-Direct.txt
http://www.securemecca.com/tmp/TeamSpeakUSA-Msg.txt
Setting up a system like this which can spam a mailing list is
an abuse
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:09, w...@gnupg.org said:
> remove the debug output and use this updated fix. Something might have
> gone wrong during the build process - we need to check.
We figured out what has gone wrong: The problem affects only the 64
bit version of gpgex. The gpg4win installer use
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:28, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> Yes I am sure. I even uninstalled it completely right now, rebooted
> and then reinstalled!
Thanks. Well, there is a problem we need to figure out.
Using my Windows versions (no Windows8 here right now), I can't
replicate the problem. Thus I b
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:51, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> I have the same problem on my german 64bit Windows 8 with Version 2.2.0-beta31
Are you shure that you are using the new version; i.e. did you reboot
your machine?
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bunde
I have the same problem on my german 64bit Windows 8 with Version 2.2.0-beta31
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Josef Schneider
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:46, fisch@gmx.de said:
>
>> good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
>> gpg4wi
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:46, fisch@gmx.de said:
> good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
> gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe and let you know when i still have this
Actually there is a bug I am currently fixing. We will release a new
beta in a few hours.
Shalom-Salam,
Wern
Hi,
> That might be the cause for the problem. The translations (*.mo) files
> from the old installer may not match the newer gettext version as used
> by gpgex.
good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe and let you know when i still have this
proble
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 19:39, fisch@gmx.de said:
> I've installed gpg4win-2.1.1.exe which fails to register the gpgex and
> then installed the gpgex from the archive:
>
> ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex/gpgex-1.0.0-beta24-bin.zip
That might be the cause for the problem. The translations (*.
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
> I can' replicate it on my German Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
> (6.01.7600). However, I recall that I noticed such a behaviour during
> development.
My windows version here is 6.1.7601.
> - Did you just install a gpgex DLL or is that the one from
> gpg4win-light
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 23:21, fisch@gmx.de said:
> just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
> german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
> context menus [1].
I can' replicate it on my German Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
(6.01.7600). Howe
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 23:21, fisch@gmx.de said:
> just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
> german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
> context menus [1].
Thanks. I'll check what is going wrong.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Geda
Hi,
just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
context menus [1].
Using beta19 doesn't translate the context menu to german but the
context menu is not broken.
[1] http://s1.directupload.net/images/
Hi!
I just uploaded another test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer
Plugin) for Windows 32 and 64 bit. These are just the bare standalone DLLs
without an installer. If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with
Gpg4win, you may want to test these DLL:
ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:25, markr-gn...@signal100.com said:
> If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most applications) then the
> system-supplied file open/save dialogs for those programs with be 32bit
> and so these will use 32bit Explorer extensions.
I was not ware that GpgEX is also used b
On 26/06/2013 03:25, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 25/06/2013 09:56, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
>> of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
>> I'm covered anyway.
>
> If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e.
On 25/06/2013 14:31, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:40, jo...@netpage.dk said:
>
>> But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
>> processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit
>
> Windows 7 64 bit has no more option to use a 32 bit explorer. This
On 25/06/2013 09:56, Bob Henson wrote:
> I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
> of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
> I'm covered anyway.
If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most applications) then the
system-supplied file
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:40, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
> processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit
Windows 7 64 bit has no more option to use a 32 bit explorer. This the
the very reason for the 64 bit GpgEX ;-)
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:25, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
> GpgEx is now working just fine. I used to use another explorer extension
> ( I forget the name - I think it used to be in Gpg4win?) which stopped
> being developed so it will be handy to have one again.
GpgEE. We replaced it by GpgEX because
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:38, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> Usually just with ShellExecute and Windows figures out the details!
I do this way in GpgOL. However Marcus decided for soemthing different
in GpgEX. I have a dark recollection that this was due to problems with
Explorer plugins.
The problem s
On 25/06/2013 9:40 AM, Josef Schneider wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
>>> As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
>>> not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
>> As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
>> not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one
>> and reboot?
>
> Yes, you can. The regsv
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Now you may want to test it out. Note that I also added an About menu
> which should always work, even if no UI-server is running. The
> translations are not yet included in the ZIP file.
>
Having finally solved my problem with instal
On 25/06/2013 12:53 AM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 06:18 PM, Bob Henson wrote:
>
>> When I ran
>>
>> regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll
>>
>> it just caused an error, saying "The module "c:\program" failed to load.
>> Make sure the binary is stored at the spec
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
> On my Window 7 64bit system, GnuPG 1.4.13 installed itself in c:\Program
> Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\ - the 32bit section. When I installed Gpg4win,
Yep, that is the default on English Windows systems.
> the installer offered install GPG2 in th
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> I need to check how to access the default browser. It uses the class ID
> of "InternetExplorer.Application" to lookup IWebBrowser2.
Usually just with ShellExecute and Windows figures out the details!
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/224816/en
On 06/24/2013 06:18 PM, Bob Henson wrote:
> When I ran
>
> regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll
>
> it just caused an error, saying "The module "c:\program" failed to load.
> Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it to
> check for problems with the bi
On 2013.06.24. 21:18, Bob Henson wrote:
it just caused an error, saying "The module "c:\program" failed to
load. Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it
to check for problems with the binary or dependant .dll files. The
specified module could not be found." It looks to
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I just uploaded a test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer Plugin) for
> > Windows 64 bit. This is just the bare standalone DLL without an
> > installer. If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with Gpg
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:09, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> Hi, I tried all of the possible functions work.
Thanks.
> The only problem I found is, that help asks for Admin rights. And if
> the rights are granted, it starts Internet Explorer, not the default
> browser!
I need to check how to access the
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just uploaded a test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer Plugin) for
> Windows 64 bit. This is just the bare standalone DLL without an
> installer. If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with Gpg4win, you
>
Hi!
I just uploaded a test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer Plugin) for
Windows 64 bit. This is just the bare standalone DLL without an
installer. If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with Gpg4win, you
may want to test this DLL:
ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/gpgex/gpgex-1.0.0-beta19
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:35, collin.kle...@gmail.com said:
> Contents of gnupg-2.0.9/tests/openpgp/sigs.test.log:
GnuPG 2.0.9 is pretty old. It even does not print the used libgcrypt
version with --version. I assume that you use a quite recent Libgcrypt
which fixes a bug, that in turn exhibits a
hello
do you know if at this time, the libray has vulnerability referenced in the
CVE ? and if yes is there any patch available ?
regards
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
hello again
if p and q are two primes numbers, is there any test during the generation
of these numbers ? some tests like : does p = q ?
do you apply the standard and recommandation for the generation of prime
number
regards
___
Gnupg-users mailing
On Sunday February 27 2011 15:26:43 Grant Olson wrote:
> Provider: Boost
> Manufacturer: Motorola
> Model: I1
> Droid version: 1.5
>
> This phone has two mail applications by default, one called 'email'
> and another called 'gmail'. Both displayed PGP/MIME messages
> without any trouble. Neither
> - The service provider
Telekom.de 9.0
> - The make and model of the phone
Apple iPhone 4 (modell: MC603DN)
> - The iOS version
4.2.1 (8C148)
> - The email application(s) installed
iPhone Mail (8C148) Mime-Version: 1.0
> - If said application(s) displayed the text of a PGP/MIME message so
> - The service provider
Verizon Wireless.
> - The make and model of the phone.
Droid X
> - The droid version.
2.2.1
> - The email application(s) installed.
Unknown: just the default Verizon Wireless email messaging app.
> - If said application(s) displayed the text of a PGP/MIME message so
On 02/27/2011 11:29 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> Not exactly Android, but FWIW, an iPod touch (which has the same mail program
> as an iPhone) displays PGP/MIME just fine (as in shows the mail - but doesn't
> verify the signature).
>
> David
>
>
It's worth a lot.
Since the rational behind this th
Not exactly Android, but FWIW, an iPod touch (which has the same mail program
as an iPhone) displays PGP/MIME just fine (as in shows the mail - but doesn't
verify the signature).
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Grant Olson wrote:
>Provider: Boost
>Manufacturer: Motorola
>Model: I1
>Droid version: 1.5
>
>This phone has two mail applications by default, one called 'email' and
>another called 'gmail'. Both displayed PGP/MIME messages without any
>trouble.
Provider: Boost
Manufacturer: Motorola
Model: I1
Droid version: 1.5
This phone has two mail applications by default, one called 'email' and
another called 'gmail'. Both displayed PGP/MIME messages without any
trouble. Neither verified sigs of course.
I see no easy way to determine the version n
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:02 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 10/7/2010 7:08 PM, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > given that -- split the file into 5? chunks and kick off 5? copies of
> > the script
>
> Given the amount of time required to write a multithreaded application
> that intelligently divides u
Hi!
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Will McDonald:
> what's the best way for me to test my 30,000 possible
> passphrases?
No idea whether it's the best way for you, but there is a small tool
called "rephrase" which might do the job:
<http://roguedaemon.net/re
On 10/7/2010 3:25 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 10/7/2010 11:28 AM, Will McDonald wrote:
Given that, what's the best way for me to test my 30,000 possible
passphrases?
At one per second, it'll take about nine hours. Your fastest solution
involves spend the rest of today polishing
On 10/7/2010 7:08 PM, Reid Thompson wrote:
> given that -- split the file into 5? chunks and kick off 5? copies of
> the script
Given the amount of time required to write a multithreaded application
that intelligently divides up work units across cores, versus the eight
hours for a single-threaded
On 10/7/2010 11:28 AM, Will McDonald wrote:
> Given that, what's the best way for me to test my 30,000 possible
> passphrases?
At one per second, it'll take about nine hours. Your fastest solution
involves spend the rest of today polishing the script, and letting it
run over
It's a
> ~26 character passphrase, and since I know the options I might have
> used I was able to write a perl script to generate the 30,000 or so
> possible permutations that I might have used.
>
>
> Given that, what's the best way for me to test my 30,000 possible
> p
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
