On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:57, ndk.cla...@gmail.com said:
> If GnuPG supported PKCS#11 it would open a whole new world, like the
> ability to use generic cards.
Nope. That is entirely unrelated. PKCS#11 is a clumsy standard to
allow the use of proprietary cards using proprietary
middleware/drivers/
Il 09/08/2016 10:27, Justus Winter ha scritto:
>> If GnuPG supported PKCS#11 it would open a whole new world, like the
>> ability to use generic cards.
> We have such a module: http://scute.org/
That's exactly the opposite: Scute allows a PKCS#11 app to access an
OpenPGP card (but isn't it redunda
NdK writes:
> If GnuPG supported PKCS#11 it would open a whole new world, like the
> ability to use generic cards.
We have such a module: http://scute.org/
Justus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnup
Il 09/08/2016 02:39, NIIBE Yutaka ha scritto:
> Currently, this configuration is not supported by scdaemon. I don't
> know any portable technical solution (supporting GNU/Linux, Windows,
> and MacOS X, etc.) to handle multiple card readers (and/or cards)
> simultaneously by a single application.
On 08/08/2016 07:27 PM, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> I am wondering if it is possible to have several GnuPG Smartcards
> connected.
Currently, this configuration is not supported by scdaemon. I don't
know any portable technical solution (supporting GNU/Linux, Windows,
and MacOS X, etc.) to handle m
Hello,
I am wondering if it is possible to have several GnuPG Smartcards
connected.
Let's assume I have several smartcards,
one has a PGP key of iden...@example.com, the other of
identi...@example.com.
If I now try to decrypt something which is encrypted for
identi...@example.com would the gpg-
