-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 17 August 2015 at 12:27:10 AM, in
, Administrador wrote:
> For me there is no trust in the fact that anyone can sign my key and put
> it on a keyserver, and because I do not know the person who did can not
> validate their signiture/
Il 16/08/2015 18:04, Einar Ryeng ha scritto:
> Is there any other problem arising from someone signing your key without
> "permission"?
The only problem I see is that you can easily get associated with the
wrong people. Like what happened here in Italy with Fidobust (about 25
years ago): some pira
For me there is no trust in the fact that anyone can sign my key and put
it on a keyserver, and because I do not know the person who did can not
validate their signiture/identity. What trust does this offer the
people who are real, trusted and known by me and whos keys have been
validated by me a
> People are stupid. Not necessarily any individual person, but people at
> large are.
https://xkcd.com/1386/
> If you rounded up all the signatures on a key server, and just started
> deleting them at random, any given deletion is significantly more
> likely to weaken the Web of Trust than to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 16 August 2015 at 6:15:16 PM, in
, ved...@nym.hush.com
wrote:
> This would require the owners of the keys to do
> periodic checking of their keys and cross-certify the
> signatures they want.
Why bother periodically checking? If som
On Aug 16, 2015 2:27 PM, "Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
>
> > What other people do says nothing about me, and everything about
> > them.
>
> Except that 99% of people who see that signature will think you have an
> association with white supremacists.
>
> Should they? No.
>
> Will they? Yes.
People
> What other people do says nothing about me, and everything about
> them.
Except that 99% of people who see that signature will think you have an
association with white supremacists.
Should they? No.
Will they? Yes.
The average person doesn't have a formal/mathematical model of trust and
wha
> I'll reiterate that there's really no such thing as unwanted
> signatures.
No? So you'd be fine if someone generated a fake certificate belonging
to "White Power Action Network " and added a
signature to your certificate from it?
There are definitely such things as unwanted signatures.
> The
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:24:38AM -0700, Schlacta, Christ wrote:
> I'll reiterate that there's really no such thing as unwanted signatures.
> The more signatures on a key, the stronger the Web of Trust. End of story.
> Please try to understand that no signature is inherently unwanted. Your
> prop
I'll reiterate that there's really no such thing as unwanted signatures.
The more signatures on a key, the stronger the Web of Trust. End of story.
Please try to understand that no signature is inherently unwanted. Your
proposal, in any form, would weaken gpg on the whole by increasing the
alread
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Einar Ryeng wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 04:26:16PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> >
> > What i meaned whith my initial post was that it should in the
> > future not be possible to sign someones pub key directly, to
> > prevent unwanted signatures. Sure
On 8/16/2015 at 12:34 PM, "Stefan Claas" wrote:
>Should now GnuPG been enhaned, or the Key Server's been updated,
>similar to the pgp.com one.in order to allow such things not in
>the future?
=
It would be very helpful if such a protection against unwanted key signatures
could be institut
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 04:26:16PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> What i meaned whith my initial post was that it should in the
> future not be possible to sign someones pub key directly, to
> prevent unwanted signatures. Sure one can revoke his/her pub
> key, but how often would you like to do th
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Viktor Dick wrote:
> On 16.08.2015 16:26, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > if i understand you correctly it would not help me if someone
> > would sign my key without my approval, so to speak.
>
> Sure it helps. If Alice signs my key and Bob wants to send me someth
On 16.08.2015 16:26, Stefan Claas wrote:
> if i understand you correctly it would not help me if someone
> would sign my key without my approval, so to speak.
Sure it helps. If Alice signs my key and Bob wants to send me something
and trusts Alice, he can derive some trust that my key is also genu
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:18:20AM +, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> reflum,
>
> On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 10:10 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > Hello Werner and all,
> >
> > after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days ago,
> > i was wondering if it's possible to enhance GnuPG in a
> > future ve
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:15 AM, MFPA
<2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Sunday 16 August 2015 at 9:10:28 AM, in
> , Stefan Claas wrote:
>
>
>
>> after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days
>> ago, i was wonde
reflum,
On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 10:10 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Hello Werner and all,
>
> after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days ago,
> i was wondering if it's possible to enhance GnuPG in a
> future version, so that it no longer allows someone to
> sign a public key without approva
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:15:03PM +0100, MFPA wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Sunday 16 August 2015 at 9:10:28 AM, in
> , Stefan Claas wrote:
>
>
>
> > after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days
> > ago, i was wondering if it's possible to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 16 August 2015 at 9:10:28 AM, in
, Stefan Claas wrote:
> after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days
> ago, i was wondering if it's possible to enhance GnuPG
> in a future version, so that it no longer allows
> someone to si
Hello Werner and all,
after seeing Facebook's public key a couple of days ago,
i was wondering if it's possible to enhance GnuPG in a
future version, so that it no longer allows someone to
sign a public key without approval of the owner.
As an example: Bob likes to sign Alice's pub key and
issues
21 matches
Mail list logo
