Timo Schulz wrote:
>I don't know the exact version of IE which is needed. And I still think
>that today a newbie would rather use XP than any older W32 version.
Should, perhaps, But can? I've constructed some PC's from old (P1-P2
hardware) that was dumped by companies, installed win98SE on it and
On Sun Apr 10 2005; 23:42, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Hmmm. I see win98 still being used a lot, but ME was such a crappy version
> that I rarely see it. Win98SE is often installed when refurbishing old
And 98 is no problem because SE comes with a proper version.
> I see no problem with this. For the
Timo Schulz wrote:
>Then I guess the easiest way is that I remove the 'supports 95/NT'
>string because I expect at least an average PC system. And this means
>at least ME and a recent Explorer version.
Hmmm. I see win98 still being used a lot, but ME was such a crappy version
that I rarely see it
On Sat Apr 09 2005; 22:41, Erpo wrote:
> It's ok to list Windows NT 4 as a requirement for running a program, if
> that's really the only requirement. It's ok to list Windows NT 4 with
[snip]
Then I guess the easiest way is that I remove the 'supports 95/NT'
string because I expect at least an a
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 22:41 -0700, Erpo wrote:
> It's not ok to list SHELL32.dll v4.32 or later as a requirement for
> running a program. This does not mean it's not ok to _have_ SHELL32.dll
> v4.32 or later as a requirement for running a program. The difference?
While I totally agree with your po
> > The version of my SHELL32.dll is 4.00.
>
> That's the problem. You need 4.32 (or anything close to it or newer).
>
>
> > Does this mean, WinPT does no longer support Windows NT (like Microsoft...)?
>
> WinPT supports all Windows versions (95 limited). The problem is that some
> OS compone
