On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> second, what does "this option implies --ask-sig-expire ..." mean? it
> seems to mean "this implies that the following options are not
> available" or something like that.
You are correct. The manual is incorrect. Setting force-v3-sigs
On Sep 24, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Phil Brooke wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, David Shaw wrote:
>> There is actually a defined field for this in OpenPGP (see section 5.2.3.22,
>> Signer's User ID). I don't think anyone implements it though.
>
> Is there any particular difficulty or reason for it not b
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, David Shaw wrote:
There is actually a defined field for this in OpenPGP (see section
5.2.3.22, Signer's User ID). I don't think anyone implements it though.
Is there any particular difficulty or reason for it not being implemented
by anyone? (It looks very similar to, fo
On 09/24/2010 12:57 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> Hmm. It's a v3 sig which can't carry a notation. Do you have force-v3-sigs
> set anywhere? Or any of the --pgpX options (which set force-v3-sigs) ?
yup, that was it. i don't recall putting that in my gpg.conf explicitly
-- it must have been there fr
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 11:53 AM, David Shaw wrote:
>> There is actually a defined field for this in OpenPGP (see section 5.2.3.22,
>> Signer's User ID). I don't think anyone implements it though.
>
> Ah, so there is! Thanks, David.
>
>>> Howev
On 09/24/2010 11:53 AM, David Shaw wrote:
> There is actually a defined field for this in OpenPGP (see section 5.2.3.22,
> Signer's User ID). I don't think anyone implements it though.
Ah, so there is! Thanks, David.
>> However, testing right now, it doesn't seem to work with gpg for regular
>
On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 10:30 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
>> Of course. I was talking about data signatures, i.e. "I'm signing this
>> with my work hat on".
>
> ah, gotcha. sorry for the misunderstanding.
>
>> The main use case I have is my Debian w
On 09/24/2010 10:30 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Of course. I was talking about data signatures, i.e. "I'm signing this
> with my work hat on".
ah, gotcha. sorry for the misunderstanding.
> The main use case I have is my Debian work -- when I sign a .changes
> file, the Debian archive will accept
