-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:41:42AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's either a GnuPG problem or an RFC problem. It's possible to add
> or remove or modify text in a clearsigned message.
No, it is not. The RFC doesn't allow it. GnuPG doesn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's either a GnuPG problem or an RFC problem.
It's a GnuPG bug if and only if it is not behavior specified by the RFC.
Given that GnuPG is correctly implementing the RFC here, that
means--drumroll, please--it is not a bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's either a GnuPG problem or an RFC problem.
It could also be a PEBKAC. :)
> It's possible to add or remove or modify text in a clearsigned
> message. If that's what the RFC allows, then the RFC is broken. If
> the RFC doesn't allow it then GnuPG is broken.
It is nei
>From: Robert J. Hansen
>Subject: Re: comment and version fields.
>Date: 2007-04-02 15:46:17 GMT (1 day, 5 hours and 41 minutes ago)
>>From: Randux
>> No, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not concerned with the
>> technical user who posts a question to a news list and understands
>> the issue. I
