Hi Werner, glad to hear from you.
On 09/14/2012 10:46 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:09, j...@zultron.com said:
I'm pretty sure now that this is correct: gpg2 password input cannot
be captured without the use of a gpg-agent.
That is right. gpg2 conceptional does not know any
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:09, j...@zultron.com said:
> I'm pretty sure now that this is correct: gpg2 password input cannot
> be captured without the use of a gpg-agent.
That is right. gpg2 conceptional does not know anything about the
passphrase. This is all up to the gpg-agent. Version 2.1 eve
Hi list,
I believe I've figured out the bigger problem.
Partly, yes.
AFAICT, the '/usr/bin/gpg' distributed with gnupg v.2 is still not
binary compatible with the same from gnupg v.1, and gpgme does not know
how to feed it a password using a passphrase_cb.
I finally hacked around the prob
Hi list,
I believe I've figured out the bigger problem.
On 09/07/2012 08:23 PM, John Morris wrote:
I still have not found a case where passphrase_cb is actually used. In
the gpg2 manpage, the description of the '--{no-}use-agent' options
indicate that the gpg agent is *always* used, which would
