On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 22:31, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
> Is there any chance of solving this issue or is rfc1991 considered
> abandoned?
Right. I does not make any sense to try to be compatible to PGP 2. It
is nice that you can decrypt PGP2 files but everything else is useless.
Face it: PGP 2
I dived a little bit further into the pgp2 signing issue. It seems that
GnuPG can't even verify its own output sometimes. When I sign a file with:
gpg --sign --local-user 0x0116CEC9 --rfc1991 --digest-algo md5 --output
test.pgp test.txt
I get a file test.pgp. When I try to verify this file it fai
On 7/14/2014 at 2:04 PM, "Johan Wevers" wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>Due to a discussion on sci.crypt I tried pgp 2.6 accept a file
>signed by
>gnupg. This worked, but only when I set the compression to 0
>(none).
>Doesn't pgp 2.6 use zip compression?
=
In the pgp 2.6 config.txt file there are on
Hello,
Due to a discussion on sci.crypt I tried pgp 2.6 accept a file signed by
gnupg. This worked, but only when I set the compression to 0 (none).
Doesn't pgp 2.6 use zip compression?
I have in gpg.conf:
compress-algo 0
cipher-algo IDEA
digest-algo MD5
s2k-cipher-algo IDEA
s2k-digest-algo MD5
