On Mon 2018-01-22 15:37:37 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
> So at this point, it looks to me like it really is an incorrect
> checksum, exposing unfortunate edge-case handling in GnuPG.
Thanks for the diagnosis, Phil and Simon.
Please file a bug report about this at https://dev.gnupg.org/ so that
thi
On 2018-01-19 at 19:57 +1100, Simon Kissane wrote:
> However, when I try to decrypt data encrypted with the private key, I
> get a "failed to convert unprotected openpgp key: Checksum error"
Simpler check:
% gpg --export-secret-key
gpg: key 4252EB6983CE74C44F549B6F8666715
On 1/22/18 12:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 06:31 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 1/22/18 5:31 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 01/22/2018 08:33 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
That is an acceptable user-id. I would have used a dot as delimiter but
that is a persona
On 01/22/2018 06:31 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 1/22/18 5:31 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 01/22/2018 08:33 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>>> That is an acceptable user-id. I would have used a dot as delimiter but
>>> that is a personal taste.
>>
>> Dot is a permitted part of username in PO
On 1/22/18 5:31 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 08:33 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> That is an acceptable user-id. I would have used a dot as delimiter but
>> that is a personal taste.
>
> Dot is a permitted part of username in POSIX though, while : is not :)
Uh? As far as I know, t
On 01/22/2018 08:33 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> That is an acceptable user-id. I would have used a dot as delimiter but
> that is a personal taste.
Dot is a permitted part of username in POSIX though, while : is not :)
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptu
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:40, skiss...@medallia.com said:
> showing that problem (whatever it is) isn't the User ID. (My reading of
> RFC4880
> section 5.11 is that having an email in the User ID is just a convention not
> mandatory, so software should be robust in the face of User IDs breaking that
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Zechariah Seth
wrote:
> Simon Kissane wrote:
>> (This is just a test key generated for testing purposes, so it is fine
>> to share it publicly.)
>
> Interesting "User ID" on that key:
> "root:testGpg:key_54503F79_3794_456C_8725_8977A68B71C1"
>
> I hope no one is f
Simon Kissane wrote:
> (This is just a test key generated for testing purposes, so it is fine
> to share it publicly.)
Interesting "User ID" on that key:
"root:testGpg:key_54503F79_3794_456C_8725_8977A68B71C1"
I hope no one is foolish enough to import your key and run your script.
__
Hi
I have written some code in Java to generate private/public keys, and
export them in OpenPGP format (using BouncyCastle's OpenPGP classes).
However, when I try to decrypt data encrypted with the private key, I
get a "failed to convert unprotected openpgp key: Checksum error"
10 matches
Mail list logo
