Re: WikiLeaks Crackers

2010-04-08 Thread John Clizbe
Faramir wrote: > David Shaw escribió: >> On Apr 7, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Andre Amorim wrote: > >>> What type of encryption the WikiLeaks said to have broken? AES ? > ... >> I do not think that this is a break of any serious crypto, though. If >> someonecould arrange for AES or any other strong cipher

Re: WikiLeaks Crackers

2010-04-08 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 David Shaw escribió: > On Apr 7, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Andre Amorim wrote: > >> What type of encryption the WikiLeaks said to have broken? AES ? ... > I do not think that this is a break of any serious crypto, though. If > someone could arrange for AE

Re: WikiLeaks Crackers

2010-04-07 Thread Grant Olson
On 4/7/2010 3:18 AM, Andre Amorim wrote: > What type of encryption the WikiLeaks said to have broken? AES ? > > Source: > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/07wikileaks.html > > ps.> I thought it was april fool. http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1610792&cid=31765168 According to the

Re: WikiLeaks Crackers

2010-04-07 Thread David Shaw
On Apr 7, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Andre Amorim wrote: > What type of encryption the WikiLeaks said to have broken? AES ? > > Source: > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/07wikileaks.html Nobody who knows is talking, at least not yet. This is early days for this particular story, so perhaps more

WikiLeaks Crackers

2010-04-07 Thread Andre Amorim
What type of encryption the WikiLeaks said to have broken? AES ? Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/07wikileaks.html ps.> I thought it was april fool. -- Andre Amorim GnuPG KEY ID: 0x587B1970 FingerPrint: 42AE C929 4D91 4591 4E75 430F 78D9 53B4 587B 1970 Download: http://pgp.mit.ed