On 18/11/15 16:59, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 has expired - that's the only thing "bad" about it.
I could not reproduce this:
> $ gpg2 -k 2C53B2ED
> pub rsa2048/2C53B2ED 2015-08-21 [expired: 2015-08-28]
> uid [ expired] Test Teststra Jr.
> $ gpg2 --check-sig DCDFDFA4
On 18/11/15 13:53, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> I downloaded the key and all sub-keys. Neither GPA Kgpg or Kleopatra give
> any warnings
> about this key. You don't say what's bad about it - which is why your not
> getting much help
> here.
Actually, I understand what he means, I just don't know h
On 16/11/15 15:01, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my key is not bad, the signature by 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 is bad. The
> question is why.
>
> Regards
>
> Sebastian
>
Hello Sebastian,
I downloaded the key and all sub-keys. Neither GPA Kgpg or Kleopatra give any
warnings
about this ke
* gnupgpacker [2015-11-15 10:39]:
> Hi,
>
> there is a German government service that signs PGP keys??
>
> What's the way to get it signed? Which institution?
It's here: https://pgp.governikus-eid.de/pgp/
But as you can see the signature is not working. And the signature for
my @gnupg.net UID
* da...@gbenet.com [2015-11-15 03:06]:
> You can only use this signature for signing (not encrypting) and for
> certification. Bad?
> There appears to be nothing bad about this public key - why would you get 16
> people to sign
> a key if you were not going to communicate with them?
Hello,
my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 15 November 2015 at 2:03:06 AM, in
, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> why would you
> get 16 people to sign a key if you were not going to
> communicate with them?
Don't people do that at keysigning parties, to strengthen the Web of
Trust?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/11/15 20:28, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello, [...]
>
> sig!3 P0x58A2D94A93A0B9CE 2015-03-27
> never Sebastian Wiesinger sig-3
> 1 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 2015-11-14 never Governikus OpenPGP
> Signaturservice (Neuer Personalaus
nday, November 15, 2015 2:54 AM
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 146, Issue 7
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. What causes this bad signature (Sebastian Wiesinger)
>2. Re: What
On 14/11/15 20:28, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for fun I tried a German government (or public-private partnership)
> service that signs your PGP key if your name on a uid matches the
> electronic data on your ID card (Neuer Personalausweis, nPA). I tried
> this and got my signed key ba
Hello,
for fun I tried a German government (or public-private partnership)
service that signs your PGP key if your name on a uid matches the
electronic data on your ID card (Neuer Personalausweis, nPA). I tried
this and got my signed key back. I tried to import it into my keyring
and imagine my su
10 matches
Mail list logo
