Il /31 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
[...]
>> > Can you try this patch?
>>
>> Of course! I have tried and it seems it is working OK!
>
> Excellent. Thanks for testing.
Not at all, David. I am always glad to be helpful.
> I've put the fix in for 1.4.2.
Excellent. Thanks for fixing! ;-)
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 01:47:36AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> Il /25 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it is possible to run the keyserver helpers not just by their
> >> name, but by their *enti
Il /25 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
>
>> Maybe it is possible to run the keyserver helpers not just by their
>> name, but by their *entire* name: instead of running
[...]
> That is basically the plan. The only (not ve
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> Maybe it is possible to run the keyserver helpers not just by their
> name, but by their *entire* name: instead of running
> "gpgkeys_xxx.exe", gpg.exe should run
> "c:\programmi\gnupg\gpgkeys_xxx.exe". In other words, instead
