Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-17 Thread J. Ottosson
On 16 Nov 2010 at 14:44, Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:15, m...@klomp.eu said: > > > This seems to be a bug of scdaemon. Kill the daemon and gpg > > -card-status will > > Meanwhile the problem has been pointed out to me: We are using the > wrong constants for PC/SC: pcsclite (Un

Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-17 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:15, m...@klomp.eu said: > This seems to be a bug of scdaemon. Kill the daemon and gpg > -card-status will Meanwhile the problem has been pointed out to me: We are using the wrong constants for PC/SC: pcsclite (Unix) and PC/SC (Windows) are not API compatible. We don't u

Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread J. Ottosson
Thanks for your answer. On 16 Nov 2010 at 11:42, Marco Steinacher wrote: > Hi J, > > Gnupg creates secret key stubs in your keyring. These are just meta > data, i.e. references to the keys on your card. They can be deleted and > are created automatically again if you do a 'gpg --card-status'. P

Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread Marco Steinacher
Hi J, Gnupg creates secret key stubs in your keyring. These are just meta data, i.e. references to the keys on your card. They can be deleted and are created automatically again if you do a 'gpg --card-status'. Probably the backup you mentioned just contains these stubs. Check if in the 'gpg --li

Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread J. Ottosson
TIA, /J On 16 Nov 2010 at 12:29, Sven Klomp wrote: > I foward this message to the list. It seems that reply-to of the > mailing-list configuration is not correctly set... > > > -- Forwarded Message -- > > Subject: Re: Testing with card, some questions &

Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread J. Ottosson
On 16 Nov 2010 at 11:15, Sven Klomp wrote: > On Tuesday 16 November 2010 11:05:05 J. Ottosson wrote: > > Even more puzzling (which lead me to believe that the backup just > > mentioned above was not made from card?) is that after having removed > > the card I could still see the card details(!). >

Fwd: Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread Sven Klomp
I foward this message to the list. It seems that reply-to of the mailing-list configuration is not correctly set... -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Testing with card, some questions Date: Tuesday 16 November 2010, 11:40:49 From: "J. Ottosson" To: Sven Klomp

Re: Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread Sven Klomp
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 11:05:05 J. Ottosson wrote: > Even more puzzling (which lead me to believe that the backup just mentioned > above was not made from card?) is that after having removed the card I could > still see the card details(!). This seems to be a bug of scdaemon. Kill the daemo

Testing with card, some questions

2010-11-16 Thread J. Ottosson
Hi, I have tested a little with the openpgp card v2 and have some thoughts. First, I'm quite impressed, lightning fast delivery of the stuff and the hw seem to work perfectly. It took like 10s to get the reader to work, no drivers installed on this 64 bit 2003 R2 server I was sitting on, impr