-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Graham wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:33:14 -0400 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> the cost is *astronomical*
>>
>> have played around with it when it was released as a free command
>> line pgp 8.5 beta
> [snipped]
>
> AFAIK this is the latest PG
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:33:14 -0400
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I prefer gnupg to pgp myself, I did just happen to see a
> > reference to pgp command line today
>
> the cost is *astronomical*
>
> have played around with it when it was released as a free
> command line pgp 8.5 beta
[snipp
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:33:14AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com wrote on
> Thu Jun 1 11:46:48 CEST 2006 :
>
> > While I prefer gnupg to pgp myself, I did just happen to see a
> > reference to pgp command line today
>
> the cost is *astronomical*
>
> have play
Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com wrote on
Thu Jun 1 11:46:48 CEST 2006 :
> While I prefer gnupg to pgp myself, I did just happen to see a
> reference to pgp command line today
the cost is *astronomical*
have played around with it when it was released as a free
command line pgp 8.5 beta
has a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> gpg integrates better with autimation and I really doubt that there is
> current, supported PGP for anything else than windows and mac.
While I prefer gnupg to pgp myself, I did just happen to see a
reference to pgp comma
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 01:59:37PM +0100, David Gray wrote:
> Will suggest to the customer that we use signed & encrypted
> transmissions. The only Issue we then have is that they wish to be
> custodians of the private key,
There is no need for them, from the cryptography point of view. Using
p
sage-
From: Andreas Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 May 2006 10:31
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Signing vs. encrypting was: Cipher v public key.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurent Jumet schrieb:
> When sending a message like this one, signed, compres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurent Jumet schrieb:
> When sending a message like this one, signed, compressed but not
crypted,
> is there anything that goes bad, in security terms?
> This is to avoid problems with line lenghth and charsets through internet
>
In securit
