Hi list.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Peter Thomas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>> The RFC is really a file format document more so than a "how to use trust"
>> document. Every now and then it is suggested that a trust document or
>> something like an OpenPGP
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> The RFC is really a file format document more so than a "how to use trust"
> document. Every now and then it is suggested that a trust document or
> something like an OpenPGP best practices document should be written, but
> nobody has taken up
On Jan 27, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Peter Thomas wrote:
Hi again.
Ok this is a first bunch of questions on signatures (again both
specific for gnupg but perhaps also common for OpenPGP).
Would be glad if someone could help me with answering these (David?!
xD).
1) For the 0x11 signature the RFC say
Hi again.
Ok this is a first bunch of questions on signatures (again both
specific for gnupg but perhaps also common for OpenPGP).
Would be glad if someone could help me with answering these (David?! xD).
1) For the 0x11 signature the RFC says "...has not done any
verification of the claim that .
