Re: Req: 64-bit GnuPG/GPGME for Windows

2016-04-28 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:41, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: > Besides my contract requiring 64-bit deliverables? :) A 32-bit GnuPG Then let's have a sub-contract :-) > standalone executable is okay, but my code needs to be 64-bit, which > means a 64-bit GPGME DLL. GPGME does currently not receive t

Re: Req: 64-bit GnuPG/GPGME for Windows

2016-04-27 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> I can't see a real reason for not using the 32 bit GnuPG version, thus > working on a 64 bit version has a low priority. Besides my contract requiring 64-bit deliverables? :) A 32-bit GnuPG standalone executable is okay, but my code needs to be 64-bit, which means a 64-bit GPGME DLL.

Re: Req: 64-bit GnuPG/GPGME for Windows

2016-04-27 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:31, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: > How difficult would it be to get a 64-bit GnuPG and GPGME binary package > built for Windows? The existing one appears to be 32-bit only, and my > development environment is 64-bit only. I can't see a real reason for not using the 32 bit Gnu

Re: Req: 64-bit GnuPG/GPGME for Windows

2016-04-26 Thread Brian Minton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Does the speedo make file always build a 32 bit version? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iIAEAREKACghHEJyaWFuIE1pbnRvbiA8YnJpYW5AbWludG9uLm5hbWU+BQJXH6w4 AAoJEGuOs6Blz7qpzJAA/j3scwJNjftJY/sSw/ADk3YCxDaokrIaOmqqcWoNmHit AP0S3Hh70UOM56zz30eFqd68x24l+mbD

Req: 64-bit GnuPG/GPGME for Windows

2016-04-26 Thread Robert J. Hansen
How difficult would it be to get a 64-bit GnuPG and GPGME binary package built for Windows? The existing one appears to be 32-bit only, and my development environment is 64-bit only. (This is not a high-priority item. Please, no one go to any special lengths.) __