> Here here! Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in
> what you send.
Folks, at the risk of starting a new thread or steering
this thread into an eddy, Postel's Law is now officially
a problem. I strongly (and I mean it) urge ya'll to take
a look at the one or two principal papers
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:53:06 +
MFPA articulated:
> Here here! Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you
> send.
I will "liberally"accept a message not CC'd to me if the individual
making the reply would be "conservative" enough not to include me on the
CC line. You cannot acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 at 8:56:29 PM, in
, Doug Barton wrote:
> I already addressed that issue in previous posts. Stop
> trying to force other people to change, and deal with
> what life brings. You'll live a happier life overall.
> :)
On 02/01/2012 03:19, Jerry wrote:
> In any case, it more than amply
> demonstrates my point of the uselessness of "CCing" on a closed list
> such as this one which you interestingly enough did not address
I already addressed that issue in previous posts. Stop trying to force
other people to change
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:18:44 -0800
Doug Barton articulated:
> Actually many of the FreeBSD lists moderate posts from non-members,
> but none of them outright block them. I realize that this isn't
> germane to your main point, but I wouldn't want the wrong information
> to live forever in the archi
On 01/31/2012 16:17, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:05 -0800
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
>>> This is an "OPT-IN"list. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
>>> this one.
>>
>> I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this
>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:05 -0800
Doug Barton articulated:
> On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
> > This is an "OPT-IN"list. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
> > this one.
>
> I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this
> list and all of the FreeBSD lists require
On 01/31/2012 05:05, Jerry wrote:
> This is an "OPT-IN"list. Some lists, like FreeBSD are open, but not
> this one.
I don't understand the distinction you're trying to make. Both this list
and all of the FreeBSD lists require you to subscribe. In fact FreeBSD
lists also use mailman.
--
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:22:43 +0100
Peter Lebbing articulated:
> On 31/01/12 00:09, John Clizbe wrote:
> > On the Netiquette part of this thread, I too set a Reply-To header
> > that seems at least one person regularly ignores. Please don't CC
> > me on list replies. One copy is enough.
>
> Well,
On 31/01/12 00:09, John Clizbe wrote:
On the Netiquette part of this thread, I too set a Reply-To header that seems at
least one person regularly ignores. Please don't CC me on list replies. One copy
is enough.
Well, I don't know if you refer to me, my apologies if so. I know how that comes
abo
10 matches
Mail list logo
