Re: default keyserver-options [was: Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist]

2011-04-11 Thread David Shaw
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 04/09/2011 10:48 AM, David Shaw wrote: >> I agree that include-subkeys should be on by default. That only makes >> sense, especially now that subkeys are frequently used for signing. > > yep. > >> I'm not so sure about include-revok

Re: default keyserver-options [was: Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist]

2011-04-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/09/2011 10:48 AM, David Shaw wrote: > I agree that include-subkeys should be on by default. That only makes sense, > especially now that subkeys are frequently used for signing. yep. > I'm not so sure about include-revoked, though. [...] > remember that anyone can fake a revocation for

Re: default keyserver-options [was: Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist]

2011-04-09 Thread David Shaw
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 04/08/2011 02:19 PM, John Clizbe wrote: >> There are additional options for the keyserver-options line. I recommend >> adding >> ' include-subkeys include-revoked import-clean'. See the gpg man page. > > Thanks for these pointers, John.

default keyserver-options [was: Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist]

2011-04-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/08/2011 02:19 PM, John Clizbe wrote: > There are additional options for the keyserver-options line. I recommend > adding > ' include-subkeys include-revoked import-clean'. See the gpg man page. Thanks for these pointers, John. If you think these are good options, maybe we should advocate f

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Grant Olson
On 4/8/11 2:50 PM, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > > I am quite sure that Grant Olson's key is on the keyserver, thus there > is no matter of hiding it, as robert j.hansen suggested. however, i > wonder why i can't retrieve it. > > gpg --search-keys A18A54D > gpg: Suche nach "A18A54D" von hkp Server po

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 14:09 -0500 schrieb John Clizbe: > Key IDs are 8 hex digits. You have typed 7. Add the '6' at the end :-) > > sks@yogi:~$ gpg --keyserver yogi --search-keys 0xA18A54D6 > gpg: searching for "0xA18A54D6" from hkp server yogi > (1) Grant T. Olson (pikimal) >

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread John Clizbe
Bernhard Kleine wrote: > > I am quite sure that Grant Olson's key is on the keyserver, thus there > is no matter of hiding it, as robert j.hansen suggested. however, i > wonder why i can't retrieve it. > > gpg --search-keys A18A54D > gpg: Suche nach "A18A54D" von hkp Server pool.sks-keyservers.n

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 13:19 -0500 schrieb John Clizbe: > John Clizbe wrote: > > Bernhard Kleine wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should > >> be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages > >> here. evolution

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 11:29 -0500 schrieb John Clizbe: > Bernhard Kleine wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should > > be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages > > here. evolution and gpg on ubuntu, however,

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread John Clizbe
John Clizbe wrote: > Bernhard Kleine wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should >> be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages >> here. evolution and gpg on ubuntu, however, fail to retrieve the public >> key from the ser

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 4/8/11 12:43 PM, Andrew Long wrote: > 'Should' and 'Must' have specific meanings within most RFC's. SHOULD and MUST do. They're presented in all-caps in RFCs to make sure people know they're being used in a formal context as opposed to a conversational English context. If you want to say cert

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Andrew Long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 8 Apr 2011, at 16:23, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 4/8/11 10:25 AM, Bernhard Kleine wrote: >> > "Should" is maybe the wrong word to use. I've never seen "should" mean > anything other than, "I want" or "I expect." 'Should' and 'Must' have

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread John Clizbe
Bernhard Kleine wrote: > Hi, > > i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should > be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages > here. evolution and gpg on ubuntu, however, fail to retrieve the public > key from the server: > > the message alway

Re: keys not available for signed messages in this maillist

2011-04-08 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 4/8/11 10:25 AM, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should > be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages > here. evolution and gpg on ubuntu, however, fail to retrieve the public > key from the server: "Should" i