Hi.
Am 02.11.2019 um 15:35 schrieb Fourhundred Thecat:
Hello,
how can I simply encrypt a file in "batch mode", ie in a script, without
user interaction, without need for the user to type password, without
gpg agent?
Maybe you can try https://github.com/jedisct1/encpipe for such a simple useca
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:10, Tony Lane said:
> was made with the unix philosophy in mind. Perhaps it would've been
> better to write the gpg-agent as a shared library to be called by the
> core instead. Well, we're probably too far down down the rabbit hole
The process boundary has security advanta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/4/19 11:12 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Separation of duties is an important part of the Unix philosophy. Thus
> we use gpg-agent to handle the operations which require private keys and
> also for some minor things which benefit fr
Exmos. Senhores,
Recebemos a informação que tiveram hoje a amabilidade de nos transmitir e que
muito agradecemos.
Vamos imediatamente analisar o caso e responderemos com a máxima brevidade
possível ao vosso pedido. Assim que for possível, o Serviço de Apoio ao Cliente
entrará em contacto convo
Exmos. Senhores,
Recebemos a informação que tiveram hoje a amabilidade de nos transmitir e que
muito agradecemos.
Vamos imediatamente analisar o caso e responderemos com a máxima brevidade
possível ao vosso pedido. Assim que for possível, o Serviço de Apoio ao Cliente
entrará em contacto convo
On 04/11/2019 17.12, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:49, Fourhundred Thecat said:
>> Imagine the authors of "cat" or "ls" decided that these utilities no
>
> Separation of duties is an important part of the Unix philosophy. Thus
> we use gpg-agent to handle the operations which require
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:49, Fourhundred Thecat said:
> Yes, that is exactly the problem. Why should simple operations require
> gpg agent ?
The manual has a chapter on the architecture, please read it to
understand the design goals and how it was implemented nearly 20 years
ago.
> Imagine the aut
On 04/11/2019 12.34, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 08:31, Fourhundred Thecat said:
>
>> $ gpg --list-secret-keys
>> gpg: can't connect to the agent: No such file or directory
>> gpg: failed to start agent '/usr/bin/gpg-agent': No such file or directory
>
> Your system is not properly ins
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 08:31, Fourhundred Thecat said:
> $ gpg --list-secret-keys
> gpg: can't connect to the agent: No such file or directory
> gpg: failed to start agent '/usr/bin/gpg-agent': No such file or directory
Your system is not properly installed. It is missing the gpg-agent
which is a m
Exmos. Senhores,
Recebemos a informação que tiveram hoje a amabilidade de nos transmitir e que
muito agradecemos.
Vamos imediatamente analisar o caso e responderemos com a máxima brevidade
possível ao vosso pedido. Assim que for possível, o Serviço de Apoio ao Cliente
entrará em contacto convo
Exmos. Senhores,
Recebemos a informação que tiveram hoje a amabilidade de nos transmitir e que
muito agradecemos.
Vamos imediatamente analisar o caso e responderemos com a máxima brevidade
possível ao vosso pedido. Assim que for possível, o Serviço de Apoio ao Cliente
entrará em contacto convo
On 03/11/2019 07.52, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 11/3/19 1:24 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
>
>> But it makes no sense. This particular private key has no passphrase. So
>> shouldn't signing work in batch mode as well ?
> Are you sure? Try to --edit-key and select that key (not the cert k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/3/19 1:24 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> But it makes no sense. This particular private key has no passphrase. So
> shouldn't signing work in batch mode as well ?
Are you sure? Try to --edit-key and select that key (not the cert key).
Then pa
On 02/11/2019 22.52, Brian C via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I can answer why the passphrase is needed: You are using the -s option
> which tells gpg to sign the file, which requires your private key.
You are right. It works when I remove "-s".
But it makes no sense. This particular private key has no p
Exmos. Senhores,
Recebemos a informação que tiveram hoje a amabilidade de nos transmitir e que
muito agradecemos.
Vamos imediatamente analisar o caso e responderemos com a máxima brevidade
possível ao vosso pedido. Assim que for possível, o Serviço de Apoio ao Cliente
entrará em contacto convo
I can answer why the passphrase is needed: You are using the -s option
which tells gpg to sign the file, which requires your private key.
Brian
On 11/2/19 11:14 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> On 02/11/2019 16.51, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> On 11/2/19 10:35 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
On 02/11/2019 16.51, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 11/2/19 10:35 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
>
>> how can I simply encrypt a file in "batch mode", ie in a script, without
>> user interaction, without need for the user to type password, without
>> gpg agent?
>
> gpg --batch --yes --passphr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/2/19 10:35 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how can I simply encrypt a file in "batch mode", ie in a script, without
> user interaction, without need for the user to type password, without
> gpg agent?
Assuming you're using gpg 2.2.
18 matches
Mail list logo
