Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> Thanks by the --enable-dsa2 tip.
>
> Someone can tellme wath line should i put on my gpg.cong?.
enable-dsa2
> BTW I also want to remove sha1 from my key preferences.
Can't be done. The OpenPGP standard requires that it be present. Even
if you explicitly remove i
* Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit
> and SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-2012) to be more
> secure and accept some SHA2.
You don't need gpg2 for that.
--
left blank, right bald
pgpdWVrO5XZaK.pgp
Description: PGP sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Thanks by the --enable-dsa2 tip.
Someone can tellme wath line should i put on my gpg.cong?.
BTW I also want to remove sha1 from my key preferences. I understand
than the standard requires to support sha1 but i
Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and
> SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-2012) to be more secure
> and accept some SHA2.
GnuPG 2.0 is not needed for DSA > 1024 GnuPG 1.4.x has su
Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> November 14th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org subject "Problem with the
> agent, gpg2"
>
> Hi, I sucefulle compiled and installed GNU PG 2.0.12 but when i do
> some operation than requires a password i get a message like the
> following.
It was never clear to me from
On Nov 17, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and
SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-2012) to be more secure
and accept some SHA2.
GnuPG 1.4.7 or later (? on the precise version #) s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mario Castelán Castro escribió:
> November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and
> SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-2012) to be more secure
> and accept some SHA2.
You
Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and
> SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-2012) to be more secure
> and accept some SHA2.
GnuPG 1.4.7 or later (? on the precise version #) supports longer DSAs
and better hash algorithms. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org
I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and
SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-2012) to be more secure
and accept some SHA2.
Charly Avital: Please note than Linux is a Kernel
Mario Castelán Castro wrote the following on 11/16/09 11:08 AM:
> November 16th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org, subject "Problem with
> the agent, gpg2"
>
> I do not have that pinentry program. GNU PG 1.4.9 (The one than comes
> with debian) do not give me that message but i need the new version o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mario Castelán Castro escribió:
> November 16th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org, subject "Problem with
> the agent, gpg2"
>
> I do not have that pinentry program. GNU PG 1.4.9 (The one than comes
> with debian) do not give me that message but i need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
November 16th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org, subject "Problem with
the agent, gpg2"
I do not have that pinentry program. GNU PG 1.4.9 (The one than comes
with debian) do not give me that message but i need the new version of
GNU PG.
-BEGIN PGP SI
Mario Castelán Castro wrote the following on 11/14/09 11:31 PM:
> November 14th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org subject "Problem with the
> agent, gpg2"
>
> Hi, I sucefulle compiled and installed GNU PG 2.0.12 but when i do
> some operation than requires a password i get a message like the
> follow
13 matches
Mail list logo
