Folks
A quick question about signing the imported PGP public keys. One of the
options under gpg --edit-key is enable. Do I need to enable the key or is that
the default?
Thanks for your help.
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
IT Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Phone: 509.375.2687
F
Folks
I'm at the next step of signing the keys and creating the trust model. I've
signed 3 keys and set the trust. When I list the keys, I get the following:
[...@app1 ~]$ gpg --list-keys
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
gpg: depth: 0
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 01:30 AM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
>> The gpg --list-sig shows that the keys are signed. Do I need to create a
>> new signature key, and re-sign all the public keys that I imported?
>
> I think the simplest thing for you to do is to modify the ownertrust of
>
-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On
Behalf Of David Shaw
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 6:00 AM
To: John W. Moore III
Cc: Smith, Cathy
Subject: Re: Migrating from PGP to GPG question
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:39 AM, John W. Moore III wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> L
On 03/05/2010 01:30 AM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> The gpg --list-sig shows that the keys are signed. Do I need to create a
> new signature key, and re-sign all the public keys that I imported?
I think the simplest thing for you to do is to modify the ownertrust of
your old signing key on the new in
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:39 AM, John W. Moore III wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Laurent Jumet wrote:
>>
>> Hello Smith, !
>>
>> "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
>>
>>> I've tried using the --yes option without success to suppress this
>>> interactive prompt doesn't pop up.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Laurent Jumet wrote:
>
> Hello Smith, !
>
> "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
>
>> I've tried using the --yes option without success to suppress this
>> interactive prompt doesn't pop up. This encryption does need to run in a
>> batch job. What do I need t
Hello Smith, !
"Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> I've tried using the --yes option without success to suppress this
> interactive prompt doesn't pop up. This encryption does need to run in a
> batch job. What do I need to do in order all interactive prompts are
> surpressed, and that the assumption is
Email: cathy.sm...@pnl.gov
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Cathy
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:09 PM
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: RE: Migrating from PGP to GPG question
Folks
I'm at the next step. The PGP public keys imported without a problem.
However, they ar
Phone: 509.375.2687
Fax: 509.375.2330
Email: cathy.sm...@pnl.gov
-Original Message-
From: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On
Behalf Of Smith, Cathy
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:18 PM
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: RE: Migrating from PGP t
Folks
This may related to my earlier question about signing the imported PGP public
keys.
When I run gpg --list-sig, the imported public keys show that they are signed.
However, when I run a test to encrypt a file with a key, I get the following
message:
[...@hrapp1 /tmp]$ gpg -e -r 0xEC3A
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:18 PM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> gpg: WARNING: key 96B12847 contains preferences for unavailable
> gpg: algorithms on these user IDs:
> gpg: "pss": preference for cipher algorithm 1
> gpg: it is strongly suggested that you update your preferences
and
> gpg: re-d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello Smith, !
"Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> The gpg --import option worked without any problems for importing the
> OpenPGP public keyring. When I try to import the secret keyring, I get the
> following message:
> [app1 ~/.gnupg]$ gpg --import se
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:18 PM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> Folks
>
> The gpg --import option worked without any problems for importing the OpenPGP
> public keyring. When I try to import the secret keyring, I get the following
> message:
>
> [app1 ~/.gnupg]$ gpg --import secring.skr
> gpg: key B4A839CC
> What are the ramifications of just saying "yes" to the prompt - update
> preferences? How potentially serious is the algorithm mismatch? I'd like to
> better understand exactly what is happening.
Ever since the very early days, PGP has supported a cryptographic algorithm
called IDEA. Back
Hello Smith, !
"Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> Another question about this migration. Is it possible to do a mass import
> of a single user's keyring or do I have to do it for each individual key.
> I've not been able to find anything so far about anything that addresses
> this.
I would try
gpg
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> Folks
>
> Another question about this migration. Is it possible to do a mass import of
> a single user's keyring or do I have to do it for each individual key. I've
> not been able to find anything so far about anything that addresses this.
Folks
Another question about this migration. Is it possible to do a mass import of a
single user's keyring or do I have to do it for each individual key. I've not
been able to find anything so far about anything that addresses this.
Thanks.
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
IT Engineer
Pacific Nort
[mailto:jroll...@finestructure.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:11 PM
To: Smith, Cathy; gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Migrating from PGP to GPG question
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:46:33 -0800, "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> We are starting to migrate from OpenPGP to Gnu
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:14 -0800, "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> We are migrating from OpenPGP which is a freeware version of PGP. Sorry for
> the confusion.
I'm not familiar with OpenPGP, the software. I'm familiar with the PGP
Corporation's implementation (which I think is just called "PGP"), but
Rollins [mailto:jroll...@finestructure.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:11 PM
To: Smith, Cathy; gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Migrating from PGP to GPG question
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:46:33 -0800, "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> We are starting to migrate from OpenPGP to Gnu
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:46:33 -0800, "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
> We are starting to migrate from OpenPGP to GnuPG.
Just for clarification, GnuPG is software tool that is actually an
implementation of the OpenPGP specification [0]. OpenPGP is not
actually a piece of software itself, nor is GnuPG a spe
On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> Folks
>
> We are starting to migrate from OpenPGP to GnuPG. One of the batch jobs I
> have to convert uses:
> pgp +force
>
> This is supposed to assume a "yes" to any interactive questions. I wasn't
> clear after reading the man pages
23 matches
Mail list logo
