RE: Automated processes

ngle task. Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John M Church Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GnuPG Users List Subject: Re: Automated processes I think it's simplistic to just brush-off this request

Re: Automated processes

On 4/7/06, John M Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Qed/Ryan et al, > Do either of you guys do automated decryption? This doesn't seem to be > addressed in the FAQ - just automated signing. I'm open to suggestions. I do use GnuPG for automated decryption for one batch process. To do so, I use

Re: Automated processes

Qed/Ryan et al, Yes you have to pass the filter a seed to run the encryption but I have to admit I don't know how it decrypts the code automagically. Ben Mord and I took this offline and he likened the resulting block to a fancy lock with the key in it b/c the seed I passed to start the encryp

Re: Automated processes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 04/07/2006 09:56 PM, John M Church wrote: > Not sure if "mask the passphrase in a non-obvious way" does justice to > encrypting it with a filter and strong algorithm - ref. > . Were you >

Re: Automated processes

Qed, Not sure if "mask the passphrase in a non-obvious way" does justice to encrypting it with a filter and strong algorithm - ref. . Were you thinking I was only hiding it in clear text? In any event, I agree with you - access to my sc

Re: Automated processes

10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GnuPG Users List Subject: Re: Automated processes I think it's simplistic to just brush-off this request as a user who wants convenience. There are very valid reasons for automated decryption. I'm working a similar project (and have my own issue - see &q

Re: Automated processes

I think it's simplistic to just brush-off this request as a user who wants convenience. There are very valid reasons for automated decryption. I'm working a similar project (and have my own issue - see "Automated Decryption via Script Running Setuid" written 4/5/06). Seems to me if you prote

Re: Automated processes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Raphaël Poss wrote: > You can: > > - use gpg-agent, or > > - echo passphrase | gpg --batch --passphrase-fd 0 > > Of course the latter provides little to no security. There is another option. Since you are using Outlook (presumably for Corporate

Re: Automated processes

jkaye wrote: Hi all, I'm new to GnuPG, and have been getting some help from a kind soul. I seem to have all the knowledge that I need with one single, but important, exception. When I decrypt, it asks for my passphrase. No problem there except for the fact that I want to have an automated s

Re: Automated processes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 jkaye wrote: > I know that for PGP, there's an environment setting that > can be used to prevent this. Is there a similar thing for > GnuPG, or do I have to jump through some hoops? Hmm.Let me see if I've understood you. You desire to use G