On 05/29/2010 08:47 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> Now in the context in which this is being used, there is no
>> uncertainty regarding key ownership, and the encryption is
>> part of a bash script. The query stops the script.
>>
>> Therefor
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Daniel Eggleston wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 00:58:57 + (UTC)
>
> "Michael D. Berger" wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 May 2010 19:46:29 -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
> > > Michael D. Berger wrote:
> > >> On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
> > >>It i
On Sun, 30 May 2010 00:58:57 + (UTC)
"Michael D. Berger" wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 19:46:29 -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
>
> > Michael D. Berger wrote:
> >> On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
> >>
> >>It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person nam
On 5/29/2010 5:58 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> I went to the account in which the key pair was generated
> and tried to sign the key. I got that the key is already
> signed. Was there perhaps something in the export of
> the public key that might have gone wrong? Or, perhaps,
> is there some o
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person named
in the user ID. If you *really* know what you are doing,
you may answer the next question with yes.
Use this key an
On Sat, 29 May 2010 19:46:29 -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
> Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
>>
>>It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person named in the
>>user ID. If you *really* know what you are doing, you may answer
Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
>
>It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person named
>in the user ID. If you *really* know what you are doing,
>you may answer the next question with yes.
>
>Use this key anyway?
