>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:14:22 -0500
>From: Thomas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Disk Partition
>cdr wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > ...things missing from true-crypt:
>>> ...authentication with a key,
>>
>I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you don't want to use such a dangerous tool, you can produce many
> containers having just random junk inside, some of them pseudo-secret
> data like "love" emails.. Many as in 10s of thousands, and random file names.
>
cdr wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...things missing from true-crypt:
...authentication with a key,
I am not sure of the context of this statement. To what are you referring?
Identification, and the subsequent authentication is already performed
at the system(operating system) level.
I
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:11:56PM +, cdr wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >The point is that the statement about deniability is misleading (or maybe I
> >I should say, close to false).
>
> Zeljko, deniability has its place. It could be semantics, but perhaps you
> are not be making suffic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...things missing from true-crypt:
...authentication with a key,
TrueCrypt is an encrypted filesystem. No other filesystem that I know
of implements authentication.
cdr
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is that the statement about deniability is misleading (or maybe I
I should say, close to false).
Zeljko, deniability has its place. It could be semantics, but perhaps you
are not be making sufficient distinction between deniability and deception.
Depending s
>Message: 8
>Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:45:33 +0200
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Disk Partition
>On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:01:15PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>> &g
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:06:31PM -0400, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>
> But most people are ineffectively paranoid. They worry about eavesdropping,
> snooping, interception of their e-mail, but they absolutely refuse to do
> anything about it. I know no one personally that uses encrypted e-mail.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:01:15PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>>>
>>>
I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
>>>
>>>A quo
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:01:15PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
> >
> >>I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
> >>
> >
> > A quote from the CrossCrypt homepage: "Denaiablity: You will not be able
> > to tell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>
>>I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
>>
>
> A quote from the CrossCrypt homepage: "Denaiablity: You will not be able
> to tell that this file has been encrypted by filedisk as it looks
> completely ra
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>
> I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
>
A quote from the CrossCrypt homepage: "Denaiablity: You will not be able
to tell that this file has been encrypted by filedisk as it looks
completely random and can have any extension you wi
nidhog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you guys have any suggestion as to how to go about encrypting a
> partition that can be available both to linux and win32?
>
> Thanks.
>
I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
(http://www.scherrer.cc/crypt/) and FreeOTFE (http://www.freeotfe.org/).
I haven't tri
* Thomas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The use of prng generated data to seed another prng function is
> utilized to compute data that is inherently random from the
> previous generation.
That is not my point, tho this might be the case. :)
If this generated data is used once, it's ok. If n
markus reichelt wrote:
* Thomas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on a sidenote, using /dev/urandom is a bad idea. f.e. the standard
slackware install and other distros as well have the following code
(or something similar) in /etc/rc.d/rc.S:
The above statement, although worthwhile
* Thomas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >on a sidenote, using /dev/urandom is a bad idea. f.e. the standard
> >slackware install and other distros as well have the following code
> >(or something similar) in /etc/rc.d/rc.S:
> >
> The above statement, although worthwhile, is not well founded.
A hardware solution cannot be scrutinized for security.
--David.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
markus reichelt wrote:
* Thomas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John W. Moore III wrote:
Running Knoppix from the CD I encrypted the Linux partition and
it's virtually invisible. (unless one knows my HD size)
What do you mean by this statement? Are you referring to the
/random
* Thomas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John W. Moore III wrote:
> >Running Knoppix from the CD I encrypted the Linux partition and
> >it's virtually invisible. (unless one knows my HD size)
> What do you mean by this statement? Are you referring to the
> /randomization of the partition by use
John W. Moore III wrote:
Running Knoppix from the CD I encrypted the Linux partition and it's
virtually invisible. (unless one knows my HD size)
What do you mean by this statement? Are you referring to the
randomization of the partition by use of /dev/urandom?
I also created a
small FAT32 par
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 10:07 +0800, nidhog wrote:
>Do you guys have any suggestion as to how to go about encrypting a
>partition that can be available both to linux and win32?
Why not use a hardware solution, so it sits underneath the OS
entirely? Seagate makes a new laptop drive that has built-in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric wrote:
>> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 10:07 +0800, nidhog wrote:
>>
>
Do you guys have any suggestion as to how to go about encrypting a
partition that can be available both to linux and win32?
>
>>
>>
>> It's not easy to do this, and I don'
22 matches
Mail list logo
