Snoken wrote:
> I checked with the source:
> http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2004
>
> In 2003 users of RSA 1024-bit keys were advised to drop them
> before 2010. Now the situation is somewhat worse than it
> looked in 2003.
That is not what the RSA website says. The website says, more-or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 17:05 2007-06-16, Brian Smith wrote:
>Snoken wrote:
>> I suppose this means that 1024 bit RSA-keys are ridiculous
>> and the Open PGP Card is a joke. And what about all web sites
>> protected by SSL with a 1024-bit RSA-certificate?
>
>This see
