*** R. Martinho Fernandes [2016-11-30 10:50]:
>I can't seem to find any up-to-date documentation on how to deploy DNS
>PKA records for use with `auto-key-locate`.
For me "gpg --export --export-options export-pka KEYID" works fine.
--
Sergey Matveev (http://www.stargrave.org/)
OpenPGP: CF60 E89A
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:16, g...@rmf.io said:
> the new one that I exported only includes the key fingerprint, so it
> obviously cannot be used for retrieval alone. What am I missing?
Use
gpg --export-options export-pka --export USERID
to create resource records for use in zone files. The f
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:32, w...@gnupg.org said:
> gpg --verify-options pka-lookups,pka-trust-increase --verify
Well, you also need the options
--keyserver-options honor-pka-record,auto-key-retrieve
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:30, gn...@lists.grepular.com said:
> I then tried verifying the output from the above command, by piping it
> into this, using a gpg homedir that didn't contain my key:
>
> gpg --verify-options pka-lookups --verify
You may want to use:
gpg --verify-options pka-lookups,pk
On 05/12/11 13:15, Werner Koch wrote:
>> verification, but if you don't have the key already, it doesn't know the
>> UID associated with the key used to sign and therefore can't do the PKA
>> lookup... Is there some additional command line option that I should be
>
> Well, PKA requires additional
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:26, gn...@lists.grepular.com said:
> verification, but if you don't have the key already, it doesn't know the
> UID associated with the key used to sign and therefore can't do the PKA
> lookup... Is there some additional command line option that I should be
Well, PKA requir
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:56:13AM -0400, John W. Moore III wrote:
> Throughout the 'snapshot' phase of 1.4.3 this ability was turned OFF by
> default. With the release of 1.4.3 stable and the availability of
> cross-certification and pka-lookup now widely available, will the
> features once defau
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:44:29 +0300, Pawel Shajdo said:
>
>> What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words...
>
> Public Key Association
>
> Yeah, I know that I should write a paper on this. There is only a
> simplepresentation on what PKA tries to solve
> (ftp://ftp.
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:44:29 +0300, Pawel Shajdo said:
> What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words...
Public Key Association
Yeah, I know that I should write a paper on this. There is only a
simplepresentation on what PKA tries to solve
(ftp://ftp.g10code.com/people/werner/talks/pka-
On Dec 29, 2005 at 16:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Sorry,.. was just an idea due to the comment in the source code:
> "It makes use of special DNS records and notation data to associate a
> mail address with an OpenPGP key."
> And the only (standardized) RR that has to do with sigs I
Pawel Shajdo wrote:
>On Dec 28, 2005 at 00:25 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>
>
>>I'm not sure, but perhaps this utilizes the SIG resrouce record,... have
>>a look at RFC 2535 about DNSSEC (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2535.txt).
>>
>>
>Seems nothing with DNSSEC.
>
>
Sorry,.. was j
On Dec 28, 2005 at 00:25 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I'm not sure, but perhaps this utilizes the SIG resrouce record,... have
> a look at RFC 2535 about DNSSEC (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2535.txt).
Seems nothing with DNSSEC.
IIRC, after looking into util/pka.c, this searches in DNS T
Pawel Shajdo wrote:
Can somebody point me to RFC or IETF draft (or other info) about this special
DNS recodrds?
I'm not sure, but perhaps this utilizes the SIG resrouce record,... have
a look at RFC 2535 about DNSSEC (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2535.txt).
Perhaps David or Werner could con
On Dec 27, 2005 at 16:30 -0500, John W. Moore III wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> While waiting for Werner or David; I'll share what I "know" about PKA in
> 1.4.3cvs:
>
> * Implemented Public Key Association (PKA) trust sub model. This
> is an optional trust model on top o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Pawel Shajdo wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2005 at 23:21 -0500, John W. Moore III wrote:
>
>>>Without context it is difficult to tell.
>>>My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH.
>>
>>I believe your "Guess" to be correct. Since the Release
On Dec 26, 2005 at 23:21 -0500, John W. Moore III wrote:
> > Without context it is difficult to tell.
> > My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH.
>
> I believe your "Guess" to be correct. Since the Release of GnuPG 1.4.3
> *will* contain support for PKA Key retrieval (among oth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John Clizbe wrote:
> Without context it is difficult to tell.
>
> My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH.
I believe your "Guess" to be correct. Since the Release of GnuPG 1.4.3
*will* contain support for PKA Key retrieval (amon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pawel Shajdo wrote:
> Salve!
> What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words...
>
> Vale!
Without context it is difficult to tell.
My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH.
Google also turned up "Private Key Access" and "Publ
Not sure:
PKI - Public Key Infrastructure
PKA - Public Key Application ?
HTH
--esskar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pawel Shajdo
> Sent: Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2005 01:44
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: PKA
>
>
> Salve!
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
