On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:02:12PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> Interesting. I'm going to have to go back to my notes from when I
> wrote that code back in 2002, and see what I was shooting for. My
> memory is that I wanted the trust depth to automatically degrade as
> the chain continued. It's p
#x27;m going to have to go back to my notes from when I
> wrote that code back in 2002, and see what I was shooting for. My
> memory is that I wanted the trust depth to automatically degrade as
> the chain continued. It's possible this is just a bug, or it is
> possible I did it this way
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 01:14:52PM -0700, bezna wrote:
>
> Dear David,
>
> First, thank you for your reply and for the working link to the white paper.
> You have my enormous gratitude for taking the time to share your knowledge
> with me.
>
>
> David Shaw wrote:
> >
> >> Furthermore, if Bob
sig 1D764C2F 2008-06-10 Elena
Curious stuff. What do you think?
George
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-trust-signatures-tp17789248p17872484.html
Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:10:28PM -0700, bezna wrote:
>
> Dear GnuPG users,
>
> I have some questions regarding use of the tsign command; please don't feel
> you have to answer all of them at once, just one will do, although I'd like
> to point out that the one most important to me is #1. I???ve
e mentioned in question 2, with the newest trust
signature winning over the older ones.
That's all for now. Thanks for reading. Please note that Question 1 is my
priority, so please don't feel you have to answer all the questions or all
of them at once.
Thank you,
